Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways.
Like base of the pyramid supports all the structure above it, similarly originality is required for supporting the other ideas.
It can't be said that originality is just putting old ideas together. If, there are no new ideas, then there won't be a base to support other inventions. I will support my this conviction that originality is just not putting old ideas together in new ways, it also means coming up with new and innovative ideas and something that's is not merely putting old ideas together.
Everyone knows about satellites, how satellites are helping to revolutionize the technological world and society and humankind. It is true that satellites launching procedure is amalgam of different technologies such as rocket propulsion, advancement of materials which can sustain high temperatures, etc. Is satellite launch procedure a invention ? Yes, it is. But can we say that satellite launch invention would have been possible without all the advancement and innovations mentioned above? No, that's is not true. Rocket propulsion is the core of Satellite launch operation, rocket propulsion is a true innovation and is not merely a putting old ideas together. Rocket propulsion was actually invented during World War 1. Yes, it was invented for launching weapons, but eventually it is currently used for launching satellites. This wouldn't have been possible without actually new invention of rocket propulsion. So, yes, true inventions are required to make new inventions in future. But just putting old ideas together is not the only definition of an Originality.
Secondly, everyone knows about internet, we use it daily more than anything else. Internet was invented was DARPA, a military research organization of USA. It was invented for a totally different purpose. It was invented for communication between different branches and the army personals. This was a new thing, a completely new invention. This is a original invention which lead to the development of internet. Internet development wouldn't have been possible without DARPA developing it. So, Originality does mean developing new things also, it is not just taking some old ideas and putting them together and come up with new stuff.
In some countries, Railway is the lifeline of the connectivity. Could railways have developed without development of engine technology ? No, not at all. Railway development was possible because of engine and other related technologies development. These base technologies were required to develop the railways. Yes, railway is also an invention, but it wouldn't have been possible without invention of true ideas, something unique, never thought before and something which is just not putting old ideas together.
So, originality doesn't only mean putting old ideas together. Originality also means, developing something new and something that is never though before and something that is just not like a lego game.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 4, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...red for supporting the other ideas. It cant be said that originality is just puttin...
^^^^
Line 2, column 4, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...red for supporting the other ideas. It cant be said that originality is just puttin...
^^^^
Line 2, column 323, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... new and innovative ideas and something thats is not merely putting old ideas togethe...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 337, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...res, etc. Is satellite launch procedure a invention ? Yes, it is. But can we say ...
^
Line 4, column 500, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...nt and innovations mentioned above? No, thats is not true. Rocket propulsion is the c...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 838, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...tly used for launching satellites. This wouldnt have been possible without actually new...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 882, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...dnt have been possible without actually new invention of rocket propulsion. So, yes, true inv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 979, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ons are required to make new inventions in future. But just putting old ideas together is...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 326, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...als. This was a new thing, a completely new invention. This is a original invention which lea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 349, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ng, a completely new invention. This is a original invention which lead to the de...
^
Line 6, column 434, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...pment of internet. Internet development wouldnt have been possible without DARPA develo...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 223, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'technologies'' or 'technology's'?
Suggestion: technologies'; technology's
...ble because of engine and other related technologies development. These base technologies we...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 354, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...s, railway is also an invention, but it wouldnt have been possible without invention of...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 17, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... old ideas together. So, originality doesnt only mean putting old ideas together. O...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, as to, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 39.0 15.1003584229 258% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2475.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 458.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.403930131 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97212236325 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.438864628821 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 794.7 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.6003584229 155% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1147313536 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.34375 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3125 20.6045352989 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8125 5.45110844103 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 14.0 5.5376344086 253% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 17.0 4.88709677419 348% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324536375686 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799031219536 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110046532454 0.0737576698707 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196370345793 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13199016221 0.0645574589148 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 58.1214874552 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.