people prefer to read news from some particular sources possessing similar points of view while others do not
With the advent of the state-of-the-are technology human beings' desire for being informed about a variety of news have increased exponentially. A plethora of people prefer to read news from some particular sources possessing similar points of view while others do not. Therefore, an important question is posed in regard to whether people should listen to mass media as many as possible or not. I, to a great extent, contend that it is better to listen and read different sources since it is more advantageous. My reasons are manifold, among which the most conspicuous ones are substantiated in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, the first exquisite point to be mentioned is getting familiar with distinctive opinions and attitudes. It is crystal clear that to reach a consensus on a matter we should listen to different news channels and read distinct newspapers and magazines. As a matter of fact, different people have distinct viewpoints toward various subjects, so through those sources, we have access to a majority of ideas. Although a large proportion of news groups all around the world are dependent on a specific political community, and they most probably do not cover all happenings and events, reading different materials can broaden our horizon very much. If one compares and contrast various points of views, he is able to realize the true fact. Therefore, the more different sources we access, the more knowledgeable we are.
Beyond a shadow of a doubt, presenting reports by different individuals leads to converting more information since it is plausible that some people may ignore some occurrences or several aspects of a news, either intentionally or accidentally, but when a large numbers of news stations reporting a given news discuss an event, It is not feasible to ignore one of them. In other words, under this circumstance, we cannot turn a blind eye to a controversial matter, which is widespread among people. For instance, in some countries, news are not broadcasted occasionally, on the grounds that it is unfavorable to political authorities. Hence, to be informed completely, ordinary people have to search the net, watch overseas news channels, and so forth. It play a pivotal role in increasing their information and knowledge about a variety of subjects.
To sum up, considering the aforementioned arguments, we may draw the conclusion that it is really significant to read and listen news presented by different people. Not only does it contribute to augment our information and knowledge, but it also helps one to get familiar with other points of view. Overall, human beings should make an attempt to access different source of news to be up-to-date and well-informed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 757, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'plays'?
Suggestion: plays
...erseas news channels, and so forth. It play a pivotal role in increasing their info...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, really, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, as a matter of fact, in other words, in regard to, to begin with, to sum up, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2287.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18594104308 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06968010005 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546485260771 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5352642897 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.368421053 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2105263158 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36842105263 5.45110844103 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327331996851 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993488084597 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.189045209961 0.0737576698707 256% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203272578311 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123139832675 0.0645574589148 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.