Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, it is one of controversial subjects that what is good for doing research? Using printed materials or use the internet. Although some people prefer printed materials such as books but I think internet based materials are the best. My argument for this choice are listed as follows.
The more trees, the much better and fresh air we could have. It is an inescapable fact that by using more printed materials plenty of trees will be cut. Thus, global warming is investable consequence of cutting trees. But if we use the interned instead of printed books, we could have much more trees than even before. Moreover, we could have fresh air and a beautiful environment so that our health would be saved. Researches have shown that as time goes by, global warming deteriorates. Furthermore, at the moment not cutting trees and using the internet are absolutely crucial.
In my point of view the second reason is that internet based books, articles and so forth could be downloaded and used on any devices like laptop, cellphones I pad and so on. As a result, we could have so many books on a small portable device and read them at any time. For instance, when I travel wherever, I am used to reading interesting articles which are on my phone and I expand my knowledge.
Third, by using internet based materials we could acquire most-up-to-date subjects. It takes so long time to print a book, accordingly there is a gap between reading a book and writing a book that a large number of novel subjects have explored. In addition, when we use internet, information transition becomes faster.
In conclusion, by using internet based materials, many trees will be maintained that could have a profound impact on our health, other creatures and our planet. For the reason given above I highly recommend all people use internet based materials instead of papered based ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 197, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... reading a book and writing a book that a large number of novel subjects have explored. In additi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, third, thus, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 320.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86875 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69232125683 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5375 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9210429921 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8421052632 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42105263158 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282668223363 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102988115745 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0973432831295 0.0737576698707 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177516014026 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660130692678 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.