Question: Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
In this modern world, which is changing day by day, a lot of lands are occupied to build structures such as houses and manufactures. A few people are concerned about endangered animals, which are losing their environment through the construction. I also agree with the idea that we shouldn't destroy this ecosystem. I feel like this for two reasons. First, damaging animals home makes trouble for ourselves due to the fact that most of the people eat meat to survive and be alive. moreover, we don't have any right to treat other living things in such a crucial way because they are as valuable as we are. I will support my nation in the following essay.
First, in some way, our life depends on the presence of different species which live in forests. If they can't dwell anymore, indirectly it means we as human beings can not provide a huge part of our food. So it will affect our own lives. There is a rule in nature, which states that every creature is another one's food. If we broke this cycle for any reason in any part of it, eventually we ourselves are going to have a difficult time providing food for a large number of individuals who have meat on their daily diet. So if we bother the animals, indirectly we make a problem for ourselves.
Second, we have a huge responsibility for every single living thing which exists on the earth. God has wanted us to protect them. But we are acting just opposite of his demand by throwing them out of their living area. Everything which breathes is alive as much as we are. Hence, it is our duty to be their advocates instead of being against them.
In conclusion, human needs for farmland or industry is not a convincing reason to take other creature's living right. I feel like this for two reasons. First, making any problem for them influences the order of food cycle, which is related to every living existing, including humankind. Second, people should be kind toward wildlife.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 283, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ion. I also agree with the idea that we shouldnt destroy this ecosystem. I feel like thi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 481, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...eople eat meat to survive and be alive. moreover, we dont have any right to treat other ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 494, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...t to survive and be alive. moreover, we dont have any right to treat other living th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... species which live in forests. If they cant dwell anymore, indirectly it means we a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ave a difficult time providing food for a large number of individuals who have meat on their dail...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, second, so, well, i feel, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 345.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62028985507 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4950545498 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573913043478 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0072061901 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.4545454545 100.406767564 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6818181818 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95454545455 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14838970564 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470036068452 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477269828497 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102057866479 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056569824281 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 11.7677419355 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.22 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.