Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Undoubtedly, old, historic buildings are now an integral part of modern, urban areas. This brings up a controversial question: is it worth to keep these ancient structures or to destroy and supplant them by modern ones. Personally speaking, I strongly believe that it is essential to preserve old buildings. There are three points in support of my viewpoint that are discussed in the following passage.
Firstly, availability of historic structures helps people to extend their knowledge. In fact, each old building is associated to a specific period of time which represents the building materials and style of architecture common in each history period of architecture. Additionally, many of them are attracting for young scientists and artists in terms of aesthetic characteristics including their outstanding wall paintings or amazing adornments used in their construction. Therefore, historic buildings would definitely give young adults better understanding of the lifestyle and culture of their ancestors.
Furthermore, old-fashioned buildings feature largely in better economic conditions. They attract many tourists from other parts of the world. In other words, people tend to go to other cities to visit historic structures. They do not want to see cement, modern giants with no character in them. As a result, the more archaic structures exist in our city, the more tourists will come to visit our neighborhood and this, in turn, means that both local and inter-community business would be improved. More shops will be built to present traditional hand-crafts and souvenirs to the visitors. More restaurants and food-stands provide visitors with ready-made and local dishes. Tourists also would bring their commodities into transaction with local merchants. Consequently, an improved commerce would be the definite result of these economic activities.
Finally, old buildings would bring more fun to urban areas. Interestingly, old buildings are often considered as the center of national ceremonies. Holding such celebrations remarkably makes city environment more dynamic. For example, Sardar Amjad castle in my hometown is the place where our national victory day is held. This day is the most enjoyable day full of joy and excitement for almost all Iranians. People enjoy the spectacular view of the castle, which is surrounded by mountains on one side and sea on the other side. Visitors can see and choose traditional costumes they are allowed to wear their favorite costumes and take photos in funny gestures in old-fashioned scenes as well.
To summarize, taking into account all these factors, I firmly conclude that old buildings should not be destroyed in order not to hurt our general knowledge, economic, and happiness. In my opinion, it is a crime to destroy them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... discussed in the following passage. Firstly, availability of historic struct...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ld building is associated to a specific period of time which represents the building materials...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tyle and culture of their ancestors. Furthermore, old-fashioned buildings fea...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...result of these economic activities. Finally, old buildings would bring more ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...res in old-fashioned scenes as well. To summarize, taking into account all th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'consequently', 'finally', 'first', 'firstly', 'furthermore', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'for example', 'in fact', 'as a result', 'in my opinion', 'in other words']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.251546391753 0.229887763892 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.138144329897 0.158761421928 87% => OK
Adjectives: 0.134020618557 0.0866891130778 155% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0453608247423 0.046263068375 98% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0515463917526 0.0685040099705 75% => OK
Prepositions: 0.103092783505 0.118717715034 87% => OK
Participles: 0.0309278350515 0.0351676179071 88% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.07207622664 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0350515463918 0.0309702414327 113% => OK
Particles: 0.0020618556701 0.00188951952338 109% => OK
Determiners: 0.0639175257732 0.0887237588012 72% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0185567010309 0.0209618222197 89% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00824742268041 0.0139019557991 59% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2850.0 2387.08602151 119% => OK
No of words: 433.0 408.028673835 106% => OK
Chars per words: 6.58198614319 5.86048508987 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48200974243 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.399538106236 0.338922669872 118% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.327944572748 0.251872472559 130% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.270207852194 0.174417080927 155% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.184757505774 0.112833075102 164% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07207622664 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581986143187 0.524397521467 111% => OK
Word variations: 71.075053975 59.2087087015 120% => OK
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6684587814 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.6538461538 20.5533526081 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2343142392 48.84282405 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.615384615 120.699889404 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6538461538 20.5533526081 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.576923076923 0.644075263715 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.54480286738 90% => OK
Readability: 49.4483034287 45.7405998639 108% => OK
Elegance: 1.64035087719 1.45489161554 113% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301808808842 0.300154397459 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0890672116249 0.103427244359 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0628633011531 0.0752933317313 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.427581893127 0.497263757937 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.151137634147 0.151897553556 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987177291018 0.114077575197 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659681422753 0.0781384742642 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.258025464052 0.336927656856 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0563973248235 0.067059652881 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206604824951 0.210909579961 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056713576564 0.0618886996521 92% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8870967742 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.91756272401 142% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 8.42114695341 131% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.4623655914 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.6433691756 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.