Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings?
Upon the question should a city try to preserve its old buildings or replace them with modern buildings, different people have different opinions based on their cultures, educations, emotions, etc. From my point of view, each option has its unique advantages but I think the benefits of building modern places outweigh the benefits of protecting historic building. In the following paragraphs, I will try to explain my position more clearly.
First and foremost, modern people need new buildings. They would like to go to cinema, park or restaurant on weekends. In my opinion, destroying historic buildings and replacing them with hyper malls, restaurants and hotels is a good idea because these modern places can attract a lot of tourists from all over the world. For example, last year, I traveled to Turkey with a group of students and we spent most of the time visiting malls and coffee shops instead of going to museums or historical places. Besides, foreign visitors will bring money to my country and it has positive effects on our economy.
In the second place, establishing new buildings will provide countless job opportunities. Currently, many people are looking for a good job so modern and new places like Movie Theaters, hotels or malls are ideal places for these people to work and serve the country. In my point of view, the rate of unemployment will decrease significantly, if government build huge complexes.
Finally, it is important to bear in mind that some historical places are important for the country because people can get more information about history and past events. They can broaden their knowledge about previous cultures by visiting these places.
Taking all the aforementioned arguments into account it can be concluded that historical buildings are ideal places because they enrich our information. But I find myself more inclined to this idea that government should destroy historic buildings and replace them with modern buildings because it has many advantages which I outlined above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lls and coffee shops instead of going to museums or historical places. Besides, f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, if, look, second, so, for example, i think, in my opinion, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 327.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21406727829 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75598461303 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559633027523 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2737316328 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.666666667 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375973843205 0.236089414692 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112427083295 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138169895818 0.0737576698707 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208283920398 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148453184892 0.0645574589148 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => The average readability is low. Need to improve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.