Technology has continually been developing throughout the world. The advancement of technology, like all other recent phenomena, is one of the most important issues that has been argued amongst academics, statesmen or even ordinary people. It has also been considered that technological progress can only have positive or beneficial effects on our lives. Nevertheless, others dispute this. I would argue that the positive effects of progress outweigh the negative.
No technological progress is more true of this proverb than industrial machinery within all fields. Take for example, in terms of agricultural and food industry we can clearly see the advanced machines that have come to our aid. Therefore, the manufacture of agricultural products is faster, more functional or even easier than previous centuries. On the other hand, it is often said that food products are produced without manual intervention. Some cite, this has led to the unemployment of many workers in the agricultural and food factories. One might think that these agricultural machineries should not have been invented which is intensively illogical. It has also been reported that so-called agricultural progress adversely affects human health due to eating less organic productions - or so the saying goes.
Consequently, the development of the agricultural and food industry, despite its shortcomings and few removable disadvantages, still is the best way to produce human food products. To hatling all few bad effects of agricultural industry in the future, food industry engineers will have produced more organic and healthy food.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Technology has continually been developi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 52.1666666667 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 1977.66487455 69% => OK
No of words: 245.0 407.700716846 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60408163265 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.48103885553 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12293556636 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608163265306 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8135962829 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0714285714 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157559103231 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713969713041 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786696716856 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11278391935 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103357892615 0.0645574589148 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 58.1214874552 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 10.9000537634 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.