Some people prefer working for a very large company that has several hundred employees.Others prefer working for a small company where they know all of their co-workers.which do you prefer?use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
The People spend most of the time at their work place. Every person has a choice if he/she wants to work for a large company with several hundred employees or for a small company where every employee knows each other. I prefer working in small company with less employees.
In a small company there is a less competition, so the promotion is very easy. The work of the person is easily recognized and appreciated. The person knows his/her co-workers very well so there will be less misunderstanding and there will be good co-ordination between co-workers to complete the certain task. The person can climb the ladder fast to reach at the top position of the company, but person does not gain much knowledge and skills.
However in the large company there will be more exposure. The person can learn the different skills. Some large companies provide medical insurance, accommodation, transportation for their employees. The stress level will be less compared to small company as the work is divided between many people, but cut throat competition is there.
In conclusion, I prefer working in small company, but the person’s growth depends on his/her own ability and intelligence. Whether the person works in small company or large company he/she can earn and learn according to his/her capability.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun employees is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... I prefer working in small company with less employees. In a small company there...
^^^^
Line 2, column 314, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...o-workers to complete the certain task. The person can climb the ladder fast to rea...
^^^
Line 3, column 3, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... not gain much knowledge and skills. However in the large company there will be more...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 215, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to accord'.
Suggestion: to accord
...large company he/she can earn and learn according to his/her capability.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.0286738351 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 52.1666666667 40% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1102.0 1977.66487455 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 215.0 407.700716846 53% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12558139535 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.48103885553 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81725349455 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 212.727598566 53% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525581395349 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 618.680645161 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6695018782 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.7692307692 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5384615385 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.15384615385 5.45110844103 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336162056731 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131584790538 0.076458572812 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965070470857 0.0737576698707 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222820489831 0.150856017488 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107479219395 0.0645574589148 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 86.8835125448 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.