Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view?
Upon the above question, different people have different opinions based on their emotions, educations, cultures and so forth. From my point of view, developing farmlands, housing and industry are more significant than protecting endangered animals. In the following paragraphs, I will try to explain my position more clearly.
First of all, food shortage is an important problem not only in my country, but also in all over the world. Undoubtedly, we will not survive without enough food and food production is a major issue in countries with limited resources. In my opinion, governments should cut down trees, destroy animal habitats and convert forests to farmlands because population growth is really high and people need food to live. Farmers should grow various plants like wheat, rice and corn in their farms because these plants have essential elements for humans. In addition, they can sell corn to companies where they can produce ethanol (a good alternative to gasoline) from it.
In the second place, people need houses and I think after water and food, a good shelter is the most important need of humankind. For example in my country, most people live in small rented apartments and they have to move from one place to another each year. I believe that, if we have enough houses or apartments in my country, housing problem will be decreased dramatically.
Last but not least, using lands for building new factories and developing industry has positive effects on our economy. For instance, establishing factories will bring countless job opportunities for people and the rate of unemployment will be reduced significantly. Currently, many products are imported to my country from foreign countries and I think making goods inside the country will save a huge amount of money.
Taking all the aforementioned reasons into account, it can be concluded that saving land for endangered animals is not an important issue and governments should use lands to develop farmlands, industry and building new apartments for people based on the arguments which I outlined above.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, second, so, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, first of all, in my opinion, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 335.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22686567164 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78148094041 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588059701493 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3702790626 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.733333333 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 5.45110844103 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271766506876 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856939274214 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742394755641 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153593396216 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460919430735 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.