In contemporary society, critical social issues have been in the limelight and triggered a heated discussion on the importance of educating the public about them. Some people propose that every TV entertainment show with high ratings ought to target audiences to learn about social concerns. However, I cannot consent to this proposal. In my view, not all TV entertainment shows require making this transformation.
Admittedly, it is necessary to improve the public’s awareness of ongoing social issues. TV entertainment programmes, especially the popular ones can attract a considerably large number of audiences. Accordingly, it seems reasonable to alter the programmes from being entertaining to educational with a focus on social problems.
However, my main reason for objection to this suggestion is that there are better ways to help promote awareness and educate people on social problems rather than TV entertainment programmes. Currently, the new social media such as Twitter, Youtube and facebook, deriving from the internet industry supersede traditional TV as efficient educational tools. It is not uncommon that people get to know the news earlier and easier from social media via their portable cell phones than from TV. Of course, the easier and faster the tools people use, the better the attention there will be.
Meanwhile, TV shows should be full of variety satisfying audiences’ diverse needs, instead of only for education on certain topics. Other contents such as comedy shows and dramas are also essential elements and well-needed for viewers. After working hard for a whole day, audiences might be only interested in watching some funny reality shows to relax or love movies to enjoy. It is very likely to lose some audiences who feel overwhelmed by upsetting social problems presented in all TV programmes, which may result in poor attraction from the public.
In sum, based on all the above reasons, we can draw the simple conclusion that it is unnecessary to turn all entertainment TV programmes into social issue-focused shows. Because there are more efficient ways to attract and educate people to bring awareness, and it is also critical for TV shows to retain other contents for entertaining purposes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 597, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the educational outcomes there will be. Meanwhile, TV shows should be full of va...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, however, may, so, well, while, of course, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1904.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 352.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40909090909 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98333330929 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579545454545 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2252475489 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7058823529 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.70588235294 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324968228183 0.236089414692 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101586586822 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610906634646 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188143861343 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532356544418 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.