sometimes we are assigned to work on a project. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The group will be helped more by a person will be willing to do what other group members want than by the person who often strongly insist that things should be done in a way that is different from what the group wants to do
In today’s convoluted world, it becomes a controversial topic of how people can contribute to their group. I strongly agree that groups cannot reach their goals and targets if they person insists on their opinion. In what follows, I will pinpoint the most irrefutable reasons.
To begin with, groups are able to increase their productivity and performance if one be willing to consider what others want. To elaborate, collaboration among all members pave the route in order to achieve success. Hence, this cooperation will be reached by the wholehearted dedication of all members when receiving others opinions. Accordingly, if all member declares their opinion, all positive and negative aspects of their view are investigated in order to make a wise decision, which bring more benefits to the whole group. For example, when I was at university, we wanted to hold a speech competition among all students. After making a meticulous program, a member of the group said that “the plane should be changed". Ultimately, we arranged the plan again, a bunch of our time was wasted, and therefore, we could not hold the competition well. As a result, had he not insisted on his opinion to rearrange the plan, our time would not have wasted to hold competition effective.
Apart from reducing efficiency, the second debatable point is that some people believe that in order to avoid giving rise conflict among the al members of the group, it is better to consider the opinion of a member who insists on his way. However, others believe that this kind of behavior may mitigate people's impetus that they are working hard, and finally, their motivation will be lost. For this reason, I will take the former viewpoint with a pinch of salt and claim that the latter point is closely related to reality. Thus, I do believe that the more one emphasizes on their idea, the more the likelihood of collapsing group will be increased owing to lack of any motivation. By way of illustration, according to the survey conducted by the University of Tehran, those members who always think about themselves in each group instill stress and pressure into members resulting in failure of bong the group.
To wrap it up, by considering all aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that people who accentuate on their opinion bring negative ramifications for the group. In the first place, they reduce and sometimes eliminate team cooperation of the group, and in the second place the stress and anxiety are caused by this person may collapse the group.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, still, therefore, thus, well, apart from, for example, kind of, as a result, to begin with, in the first place, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2130.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03546099291 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80618939185 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543735224586 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9594896769 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.333333333 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2222222222 5.45110844103 206% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326206311502 0.236089414692 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100734711476 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653808639393 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190328898315 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510927482262 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.