For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.
Undoubtedly, in this modern time governments have limited resources and they have to spend their budgets in right ways. In my opinion, government should use its money on universities. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in following essay.
To begin with, students of universities have a lot of desires and dreams about their life and they want to change everything in their life and solve all problems in not their home country but in the globe. This is obvious that university should has a responsibility about its students and should help them to follow their dream and achieve their goals. Without a good educational programs and well educated professors, student's talent can be wasted and their energy can be disappeared.
For example, when I was in university, I always wanted to get to the doctoral program and I spend my whole time in library for studying and research. But after a while I noticed that our professors are not as good as enough to teach in doctoral level. Thus, I gradually lust my energy and focus and I decided to migrate to another country to continue my academic career. There is no doubt that my country has been spent a lot of money for student education from elementary school until graduate program but low quality of university programs led students to think about migration. this wasting money and talented people for a country can be very harmful and make government weak because of eventual effects of young educated people.
Second, students who study in the universities are more creative than anyone else in community. They can be more useful than others in the country. If government spend money on university and improve quality of educational systems and other facilities as well as equipment this can be a start point for having a positive result in the future. We all know that children have a massive attention from their parent and always their parent spent a lot of money on their education. Instead students in universities are independent person so they need more support and if government and university support them they can be successful in their study and have a positive impact in community after graduation.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that governments should spend their money on university. This is because this will avoid migration of talented people and and because student in the universities can improve life of community.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
... This is obvious that university should has a responsibility about its students and...
^^^
Line 3, column 1068, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... led students to think about migration. this wasting money and talented people for a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 478, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...pent a lot of money on their education. Instead students in universities are independen...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...will avoid migration of talented people and and because student in the universities can...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent in the universities can improve life of community.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, thus, well, while, for example, i feel, in conclusion, no doubt, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2013.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 406.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95812807882 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74742737028 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477832512315 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 642.6 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1596040125 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.833333333 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267890219717 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927138406999 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700202265014 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171485954599 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390375202821 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.