In general, people think that society in the past did not appreciate and value teachers than nowadays. They think that in the past, people punished their students without any permission, which makes students angry at them. However, the notion does not reflect the stance that I hold and should not be thought about in a different light. I believe that teachers in the past were respected and appreciated by society because people today are able to learn many contents through the Internet without teachers and as infant rate is declined in the world, parents would unduly take care of their children whatever their children do.
First of all, today’s people are able to access the internet for learning a great deal of contents. To be specific, as modern technologies have become drastically, people are capable to take advantage of a lot of methods for learning a wide of subjects from beginning to the advanced one. Following these technologies, teachers’ responsibilities are also disappeared. For example, the most powerful engine is website “Youtube”, which provides various video contents including learning and tutorials. Today’s people easily access the site and learn lots from the site. Thus, this proves that teachers in modern society would not be appreciated and valued by society because modern technologies make their status to be lower than in the past.
Moreover, as infant rate is too low in modern societies, parents are likely to unduly take care of their children. In addition, with parents’ caring, children do not tend to respect their teachers, which as a result is today’s societies problems. Further, the population of teacher has declined over time and they also are treated just as teachers not beyond teacher, with lower status than in the past. For instance, a study done by The Korean Herald revealed that teachers today are likely to resign from their position because they are not respected by society. The study indicated that 62 percent of 200 Korean teachers would have their mind with resign their job within five years. This was because they are treated by their students and parents wrongly. They are no longer thinking about teacher that should be respected. As a result, it is legitimate to say that nowadays society are treating teachers less appreciated, valued and respected because of students and parents’ treatment against teachers.
To sum up, I believe that people in the past were more appreciated and valued by society because people in modern society are able to learn a lot of contents from the Internet and teachers are treated as lower status in society by their students and parents. Consequently, the importance of my views cannot be underestimated in that it can kill two birds with one stone for the reasons I have mentioned above. All in all, this trend will probably continue for the next generations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In general, people think that society in...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r children whatever their children do. First of all, today's people are ab...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r status to be lower than in the past. Moreover, as infant rate is too low in m...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ents' treatment against teachers. To sum up, I believe that people in the ...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'thus', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'in general', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.250457038391 0.229887763892 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.160877513711 0.158761421928 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0712979890311 0.0866891130778 82% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0493601462523 0.046263068375 107% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0438756855576 0.0685040099705 64% => OK
Prepositions: 0.155393053016 0.118717715034 131% => OK
Participles: 0.0475319926874 0.0351676179071 135% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.81489287218 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0219378427788 0.0309702414327 71% => OK
Particles: 0.0018281535649 0.00188951952338 97% => OK
Determiners: 0.0694698354662 0.0887237588012 78% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0146252285192 0.0209618222197 70% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0091407678245 0.0139019557991 66% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2923.0 2387.08602151 122% => OK
No of words: 473.0 408.028673835 116% => OK
Chars per words: 6.17970401691 5.86048508987 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.48200974243 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.395348837209 0.338922669872 117% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.291754756871 0.251872472559 116% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.209302325581 0.174417080927 120% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.105708245243 0.112833075102 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81489287218 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45665961945 0.524397521467 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 51.4151621676 59.2087087015 87% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6684587814 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.5238095238 20.5533526081 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5007049153 48.84282405 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.19047619 120.699889404 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5238095238 20.5533526081 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.714285714286 0.644075263715 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.54480286738 72% => OK
Readability: 51.6992852109 45.7405998639 113% => OK
Elegance: 1.78417266187 1.45489161554 123% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.471223504209 0.300154397459 157% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.139549474685 0.103427244359 135% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0872809273406 0.0752933317313 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.492371784641 0.497263757937 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.123057127216 0.151897553556 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174130180607 0.114077575197 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135065054782 0.0781384742642 173% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.408770388358 0.336927656856 121% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.014647292175 0.067059652881 22% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.376507644599 0.210909579961 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0898528461241 0.0618886996521 145% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8870967742 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.86379928315 233% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.91756272401 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 8.42114695341 107% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 2.4623655914 325% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.6433691756 139% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.