The answer to the question as to what area the government should spend less on whether on scientific researches, art or parks and public gardens during economic crises, is relative to the lens from which one is looking through. The choice of what should be removed from limelight should be made in consideration of what is best for the economy. There is a group of people that may concur with the idea that government spending on parks and public gardens should be reduced and it is with this group of people that I choose to identify with. The rationale behind my viewpoint will be bolstered in the trailing paragraphs.
To begin with, in a situation of economic crises, searchlights should focus on what will most rapidly rescue the economy from such situation and investment in scientific research is what comes to mind. Undoubtedly, scientific research could go a long way to curb further spread of the unpleasant crises and also provide ways to solve the present problem. For instance, during the last recession in Nigeria, scientific research that include the innovation of phones, computers, agricultural equipment, and so on were carried out, and this, to a great extent, pulled us out of the mire of economic crises. Besides, if the government had invested in parks and public gardens, we wouldn't have been able to get out so rapidly, from that recession.
Another vital area that the government should focus on at the climax of an economic downturn is the arts. This is because art is something that is widely accepted. Furthermore, during an economic recession, many people kind of get depressed, and so, their involvement in art exhibition either by participation or by appreciation could be an enormous asset to suppress depression. For example, during the aforementioned depression in Nigeria, it is unarguable that art centres witnessed visits from milliards of people. Everybody wanted to look for a way to ease off, so, they turned to art for succour. Moreover, there are many existing parks and public gardens in town, therefore, the government should focus more on arts, and limit expenditure on the parks.
While increasing the budget on parks and public gardens might be a great idea, I strongly believe that reducing the expenditure on them would be more beneficial because the government would only concentrate on repairs and not spend heavily on the construction of more parks and gardens.
In a nutshell, the during an economic downturn, when faced with this crucial decision, the government should reduce the amount spent on parks and public gardens in order to create room for increased spending the more profiting scientific research and art.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The answer to the question as to what ar...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... bolstered in the trailing paragraphs. To begin with, in a situation of economi...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 683, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...nvested in parks and public gardens, we wouldnt have been able to get out so rapidly, f...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t out so rapidly, from that recession. Another vital area that the government s...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, and limit expenditure on the parks. While increasing the budget on parks and...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nstruction of more parks and gardens. In a nutshell, the during an economic do...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rofiting scientific research and art.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, for instance, kind of, to begin with, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2235.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05656108597 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80129694843 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.9213332484 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.6875 100.406767564 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 20.6045352989 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 5.45110844103 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372159552808 0.236089414692 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116513054448 0.076458572812 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10703504673 0.0737576698707 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217387046368 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066366907732 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.