Being honest in our personal and professional life is an essential characteristic which contributes to having a long-lasting relationship. Some people believe that always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relations between individuals. Others, on the other hand, hold the opposite view and make the notion that being honest does not always result in our favourable desires and presumably brings about the end of relationship whether personal or professional. I personally am of the opinion that the latter carries more weight. There are some critical cases which we have to circumvent telling the truth and will be aruged in the following essay.
To start with, even now and then individuals have faced some unique and critical circumstances which telling the truth could hurt his or her close friend, parent or partner. If one's wife is detected having a tumour, presumably the physician first lets the husband to know about this serious disorder. Consequently, the physician would suggest that it is the husband's decision to tell his wife about this horrible news. Telling the truth in this case is not an effective and correct decision as probably brings about more stresses and pressure on the patient, discouraging her to start the treatment. If the physician tells her about the side-effects of the treatment, supposedly, she even might not try to do the treatment. On the other hand, hiding the reality about her illness and convincing her that she has detected by a virus which 1 in 10 people has been detected, does go along way towards her well-being. Showing the treatment outcome of number of patients who got the same disease also encourages her to undergo treatment operations. As this example has showed, sometimes telling white lies not only hinders breaking down of the relationship but also may save a life.
In addition, always telling the truth might cause some adverse effects in our relationships with our colleagues. Consider a case when two colleagues have spoken with each other about the corrupted management system which one of them was heard from other people. If one of these two staff goes to the manager and tells all the gossip about the corruption, the other staff would face pressing problems which might even cost him or her resigning of the post. Furthermore, when an employee speak with a senior colleague, he or she would be careful when talking about the technical problems associated with the senior colleague. This is a mindful and mature decision if always talk in a manner which shows compliments towards the senior colleague or manager. Telling the exact truth that they work is worthless or they do not have deep knowledge regarding some special project would have some detrimental impact on the job.
In conclusion, although being honest is a key characteristic which we should consider in our personal and professional relationships, it does not mean to stick to it always. There are some cases which it is recommended to circumvent the truth somehow to prevent the upcoming consequences which might end our relationships.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...her close friend, parent or partner. If ones wife is detected having a tumour, presu...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1023, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e disease also encourages her to undergo treatment operations. As this example ha...
^^
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...nships, it does not mean to stick to it always. There are some cases which it is recom...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, then, well, in addition, in conclusion, talking about, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2600.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 509.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10805500982 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85332735413 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504911591356 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 781.2 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1402336775 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.80952381 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2380952381 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134623490378 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480661180958 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590198374097 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0831041473616 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496405180949 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.