Reading and lecture have contradictory in term of reliability of online encyclopedias. Although reading expresses three reasons to refute validity of these information sources but professor disagrees and give her reasons to admire credibility of communal online encyclopedias.
First, reading states that people who write these communal online encyclopedias have not enough knowledge on that specific topic because of shortage of experts so they almost make so many errors. In the lecture professor says traditional printed books also contain errors the difference is that online form can be corrected easily.
Second, author claims that communal online encyclopedias may be attack by hackers and other malicious person that can falsify original text. Professor expresses two strategies to avoid falsification of communal online encyclopedias, first giving read only format of them and second hiring some editors for monitoring and correcting the corrupted part of text continuous. Finally, reading says communal online encyclopedias focused on a topic and cause false and complex impression on readers, on the other hand reading claims that most of communal online form topics are trivial and less academic. However, professor refutes this and says against printed form craters which always encountered a shortage of space and enforced to select more important topics, online communal encyclopedias have enough space to present diversity topics and meet different people need.
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.311965811966 0.229887763892 136% => OK
Verbs: 0.162393162393 0.158761421928 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.123931623932 0.0866891130778 143% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0555555555556 0.046263068375 120% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0128205128205 0.0685040099705 19% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.115384615385 0.118717715034 97% => OK
Participles: 0.0555555555556 0.0351676179071 158% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.87181579359 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0213675213675 0.0309702414327 69% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0470085470085 0.0887237588012 53% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0128205128205 0.0209618222197 61% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0128205128205 0.0139019557991 92% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1477.0 2387.08602151 62% => OK
No of words: 219.0 408.028673835 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.74429223744 5.86048508987 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 4.48200974243 86% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.51598173516 0.338922669872 152% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.369863013699 0.251872472559 147% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.237442922374 0.174417080927 136% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.159817351598 0.112833075102 142% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87181579359 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 212.727598566 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616438356164 0.524397521467 118% => OK
Word variations: 62.6854427503 59.2087087015 106% => OK
How many sentences: 8.0 20.6684587814 39% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 27.375 20.5533526081 133% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8233821978 48.84282405 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 184.625 120.699889404 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.375 20.5533526081 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.25 0.644075263715 194% => Less Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.5376344086 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.54480286738 0% => OK
Readability: 64.3613013699 45.7405998639 141% => OK
Elegance: 2.09259259259 1.45489161554 144% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309374235393 0.300154397459 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.135936895028 0.103427244359 131% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0318327610171 0.0752933317313 42% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.647961017701 0.497263757937 130% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.105982775195 0.151897553556 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162383612455 0.114077575197 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423969159028 0.0781384742642 54% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.248466963245 0.336927656856 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0348098380785 0.067059652881 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232531694855 0.210909579961 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181698706813 0.0618886996521 29% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8870967742 34% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.91756272401 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 8.42114695341 47% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 13.6433691756 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.