TPO 19_ Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
That getting information from many different resources plays an absolute significant role in spread spectrum of a modern person’s life is an undeniable fact. Should people realize the advantages of using different news resources in today’s complicated world they will ponder over it much more scrupulously. This issue has recently been the topic of debate among sociologists. In the existence of all points of view, I do believe that the two paramount objectives of getting news from many different resources are being aware of the all international issues and finding reliable resources. Seeing different points of view about a single event can be noted as another rationale.
To begin with, it is incontrovertibly axiomatic that checking different news resources results in being aware of the all international issues. In other words if we only check just one news channel or website, we might lose an important event. For example during the last summer, the Olympic games were held in Brazil, and because I am a big fan of swimming competitions, I had to check different sources to get access to news about the winners of gold medals.
The second reason why I advocate this point of view lies in the fact that nowadays finding reliable news resources is really hard. That is to say, most people believe that some news agencies are not independent and trusting them is a big mistake. To elucidate, once I was looking for the number of victims of AIDS in Africa and surprisingly I understood that some websites tend to hide the true number of victims. Therefore on no account can underrate efficacy of checking numerous sources with regards to finding a trust-able resource.
Having discussed this issue from this point of view, I am going to empower it by the following discussion. Sometimes we need to see an event from different aspects and if we limit ourselves to a few resources, we may neglect other aspects which might be important. It’s like seeing the bright sight of the moon and forgetting about the dark side. For example when a new dam had been constructed in our state, most of the news resources were talking about the benefits of this dam for local agriculture and nobody was mentioning the damages caused by construction process to traditional inhabitants of the river like fishes and frogs.
By taking all above-mentioned arguments to the consideration, the following conclusion can be drawn about the issue. Inasmuch as getting up-to-date, reliable and comprehensive news has profound effects on the complexity of our point of view about an event, underestimating the significance of checking different news sources in not logical.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
The reasons and content for those reasons are somehow duplicated. You can simply apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essays/speaking topics.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 22 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 439 350
No. of Characters: 2178 1500
No. of Different Words: 233 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.577 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.961 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.876 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 153 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 122 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 85 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 63 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.389 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.346 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.444 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.32 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.32 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.083 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
That getting information from many different resources plays an absolute significant...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 495, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ramount objectives of getting news from many different resources are being aware of the all in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...end to hide the true number of victims. Therefore on no account can underrate efficacy of...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'look', 'may', 'really', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'for example', 'talking about', 'in other words', 'to begin with', 'that is to say']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.244306418219 0.229887763892 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.163561076605 0.158761421928 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.109730848861 0.0866891130778 127% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0289855072464 0.046263068375 63% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0434782608696 0.0685040099705 63% => OK
Prepositions: 0.144927536232 0.118717715034 122% => OK
Participles: 0.0683229813665 0.0351676179071 194% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.9836112279 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0269151138716 0.0309702414327 87% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.109730848861 0.0887237588012 124% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0165631469979 0.0209618222197 79% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00621118012422 0.0139019557991 45% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2669.0 2387.08602151 112% => OK
No of words: 439.0 408.028673835 108% => OK
Chars per words: 6.07972665148 5.86048508987 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.48200974243 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.362186788155 0.338922669872 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.289293849658 0.251872472559 115% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.20728929385 0.174417080927 119% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.152619589977 0.112833075102 135% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9836112279 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537585421412 0.524397521467 103% => OK
Word variations: 62.6402840735 59.2087087015 106% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6684587814 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.3888888889 20.5533526081 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.569664875 48.84282405 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.277777778 120.699889404 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3888888889 20.5533526081 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.644075263715 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 53.3182738547 45.7405998639 117% => OK
Elegance: 1.93859649123 1.45489161554 133% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260991697274 0.300154397459 87% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0833411613093 0.103427244359 81% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0512660327634 0.0752933317313 68% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.538395158182 0.497263757937 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.139460491563 0.151897553556 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108262378489 0.114077575197 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443918219069 0.0781384742642 57% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.374764520271 0.336927656856 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0399723928806 0.067059652881 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186867141258 0.210909579961 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275151896805 0.0618886996521 44% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8870967742 59% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.86379928315 155% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.91756272401 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 8.42114695341 71% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 2.4623655914 244% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.