Nowadays, the news is set to play a pivotal role in everyone's daily life than ever before. Due to fast pace of changing in the current circumstance, some people have shown a growing appetite to get informed from different resource to keep pace with this trend. While I believe it can not be generalized to all cases and situations, I tend to agree on such a view based on the following concerns.
The main point to support this is that acquiring news from miscellaneous resources has paved the way to get familiar with different ideology. To begin with, people harbor different perception about the same topic. Through seeking different references, not only can one be well-informed but also it is regarded as a great chance to see an issue with different outlooks. In addition, in some countries, the accessibility to the accurate account of information about a specific subject, for example in political framework, has faced with censorship. Needless to say, some, if not all, parts of this category of the news might be concealed. Hence, there is a little doubt that for those group of people who are interested in politics, going through different resource is not an option but it is known as an inevitable part of pursuing their hobbies. In addition, people with high sense of shrewdness easily have evaluated the trustworthy of any published news approximately. Therefore, it is over-simplistic for versatile readers to distinguish between a rumor and an authentic news.
On the negative side, checking out various resources can be accompanied with some demerits. It should be noted that since some news providers tend to gain reputation or absorb more people's attention, start to broadcast some gossips. So, it might be time-consuming if any individuals spend a large amount of time to realize the truth. Moreover, by seeking distinct news' pages, it seems hard for readers to draw a cogent conclusion especially in those cases that a non-expert follower tends to be apprised. Based on previous example, an amateurish reader soon is misled by some controversial pitfalls in presidential elections.
From what has been discussed, different news resource is likely to be more favorable. As it was mentioned, not only can it broaden one's horizon but also it helps people to examine the authenticity of any news. However, It might be confusing or time-wasting activity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1062, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'authentic news'.
Suggestion: authentic news
...ders to distinguish between a rumor and an authentic news. On the negative side, checking out...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... was mentioned, not only can it broaden ones horizon but also it helps people to exa...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'moreover', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'in addition', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.209195402299 0.229887763892 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.186206896552 0.158761421928 117% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0965517241379 0.0866891130778 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0459770114943 0.046263068375 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.032183908046 0.0685040099705 47% => OK
Prepositions: 0.131034482759 0.118717715034 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0666666666667 0.0351676179071 190% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 3.01303521795 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0459770114943 0.0309702414327 148% => OK
Particles: 0.00229885057471 0.00188951952338 122% => OK
Determiners: 0.103448275862 0.0887237588012 117% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0183908045977 0.0209618222197 88% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00459770114943 0.0139019557991 33% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2380.0 2387.08602151 100% => OK
No of words: 391.0 408.028673835 96% => OK
Chars per words: 6.08695652174 5.86048508987 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.48200974243 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.347826086957 0.338922669872 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.291560102302 0.251872472559 116% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.237851662404 0.174417080927 136% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.176470588235 0.112833075102 156% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01303521795 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572890025575 0.524397521467 109% => OK
Word variations: 66.8924670894 59.2087087015 113% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6684587814 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.5789473684 20.5533526081 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7672935229 48.84282405 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.263157895 120.699889404 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5789473684 20.5533526081 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.789473684211 0.644075263715 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 49.7349575986 45.7405998639 109% => OK
Elegance: 1.53913043478 1.45489161554 106% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296749401637 0.300154397459 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0651972223288 0.103427244359 63% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0354509284403 0.0752933317313 47% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.469765402856 0.497263757937 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0970718392336 0.151897553556 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114613197564 0.114077575197 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580085140312 0.0781384742642 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.354112571973 0.336927656856 105% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0486705666397 0.067059652881 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206087529565 0.210909579961 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543871595676 0.0618886996521 88% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8870967742 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.91756272401 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.6433691756 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.