Some proponents might claim that young people who undertake same job as their parents can gain a number of advantages including abundant related resources, free career consultation. However, in my personal view, its demerits outweigh its merits a lot due to the following justifications.
Firstly, one cannot deny that children’s interests probably are not identical with their parents’ interests. This circumstance is very common during this age. Different from their parents who live in a time that are with limited both material and spiritual resources, nowadays children, especially those from relatively wealthy family, have a myriad of opportunities to experience sorts of things, such as learning abroad, traveling a lot at young age. It is reasonable to say that those amount of experience and sorts of values they learned from other people cast significant influence on themselves, which might result in a different outlook from their parents. Different outlook leads to different career choice. Therefore, it does not make sense that parents force their children to choose the same cause as theirs.
Also, some parents’ jobs are not promising or suitable at all for their children. This happens commonly to elder generations. Due to the upset fact that they did not have any access to get educated because of poor financial condition, a large amount of elder people have to make a life at young age as factory workers, farmers. Lack of education, their career seldomly become promising or influent. So I seriously doubt that youngster who are ambitiou would like to choose such types of job as their career. For example, a couple might choose to work as a menial factory workers, because of their disadvantaged education. When they raise a child, they certainly do not want their child repeat their low demanding career path. In this regard, it is plain to see that there is no good at all for young people choose similar careers to their parents’ jobs if their jobs are menial and provide modest salary.
Admiitedly, there are some adavantages of choosing same jobs, of which the most prominent one I presume is that parents as seasoned veterans in the specific field can provide substantial consultation and valuable information that is hard to obtain to outsiders. It can ideed help them avoid inconspicuous pitfalls and save unnecessary efforts, even providing an effective shorcut to the success. Nevertheless, with the proliferation of Internet and other sophisticated technology, infomation gaps beome narrower than it was in the past, making competely possible to obtain valid intelligence and consultation related to certain field. Hence, the advantage over information of choosing similar job seem to lose its competitive edge.
In a nutshell, selecting similar jobs is not optimal due to the justificaitons I mentioned above. When it comes to career selection, what we should give the priority to is what we are good at and have enthusiasm towards.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...irs. Also, some parents' jobs are not promising or suitable at all for their children. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 442, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...nt. So I seriously doubt that youngster who are ambitiou would like to choose such type...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2528.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 478.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28870292887 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96805526855 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55230125523 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 789.3 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.994623655914 302% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.4166259819 48.9658058833 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.909090909 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68181818182 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405883606868 0.236089414692 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11238133282 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108818890733 0.0737576698707 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183560459441 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101431934429 0.0645574589148 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 86.8835125448 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.