TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use spe

Studying in a group study has a lot of advantageous. It has interaction, students can quiz each other, and also they learn team working. Thus, I suggest that student should work together.
Working as a team has interaction. When someone studies alone, he may tired soon and make a lot of mistake. However during studying groups, students work together. Studying become more enjoyable for them and they become fatigued rarely. In addition, when one of the group members encounters difficulty, he can use the other members' experience and knowledge.
Student can quiz each other in a group study. Another benefit of studying groups is that students can improve their abilities by quizzing. When they are studying together, they can test each other by asking questions about the textbook materials and improve their learning abilities.
Students learn team working. They learn that how should work together in order to improve the outcome. When me and my friends work together on our projects, each of us has a specific duty. I have to collect information by interpretation with people and write down my observations. In the end, each of us writes a report about his duty and get the project done in the best way.
Studying as a team has a lot of benefits for students. They can use the other members' experience and knowledge through interaction. Quizzing each other is another benefit of studying groups, and also students learn how to work with each other as a team.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to team'
Suggestion: to team
...an quiz each other, and also they learn team working. Thus, I suggest that student s...
^^^^
Line 2, column 90, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun mistake seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of mistakes'.
Suggestion: a lot of mistakes
...udies alone, he may tired soon and make a lot of mistake. However during studying groups, studen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 108, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...y tired soon and make a lot of mistake. However during studying groups, students work t...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 324, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'members'' or 'member's'?
Suggestion: members'; member's
...unters difficulty, he can use the other members experience and knowledge. Student can ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 16, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to team'
Suggestion: to team
...eir learning abilities. Students learn team working. They learn that how should wor...
^^^^
Line 4, column 292, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... write down my observations. In the end, each of us writes a report about his dut...
^^
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'members'' or 'member's'?
Suggestion: members'; member's
...ts for students. They can use the other members experience and knowledge through intera...
^^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'thus', 'in addition']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.227436823105 0.229887763892 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.176895306859 0.158761421928 111% => OK
Adjectives: 0.043321299639 0.0866891130778 50% => Some adjectives wanted.
Adverbs: 0.0469314079422 0.046263068375 101% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0758122743682 0.0685040099705 111% => OK
Prepositions: 0.115523465704 0.118717715034 97% => OK
Participles: 0.0505415162455 0.0351676179071 144% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.69142781884 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0108303249097 0.0309702414327 35% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00361010830325 0.00188951952338 191% => OK
Determiners: 0.0974729241877 0.0887237588012 110% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0324909747292 0.0209618222197 155% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0216606498195 0.0139019557991 156% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1465.0 2387.08602151 61% => OK
No of words: 247.0 408.028673835 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.93117408907 5.86048508987 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.48200974243 88% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.348178137652 0.338922669872 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.295546558704 0.251872472559 117% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.198380566802 0.174417080927 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.101214574899 0.112833075102 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69142781884 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 212.727598566 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493927125506 0.524397521467 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 45.731388849 59.2087087015 77% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6684587814 92% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.5533526081 63% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7736614162 48.84282405 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.1052631579 120.699889404 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.0 20.5533526081 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.368421052632 0.644075263715 57% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.54480286738 126% => OK
Readability: 42.5546558704 45.7405998639 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.31325301205 1.45489161554 90% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221324529814 0.300154397459 74% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0671134047883 0.103427244359 65% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0823921751315 0.0752933317313 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.459944622022 0.497263757937 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.158284931313 0.151897553556 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823545784066 0.114077575197 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555214494721 0.0781384742642 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.249672524313 0.336927656856 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0306242301119 0.067059652881 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143426922326 0.210909579961 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530811227376 0.0618886996521 86% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8870967742 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.86379928315 52% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.91756272401 163% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 8.42114695341 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.75985663082 217% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.6433691756 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.