In general, people think that students who work alone are able to learn more effective than do together, when teachers assign projects. They support that they are able to improve their skills such as how to collect information what they want and how to follow effective way. However, the notion does not reflect the stance that I hold and should not be thought about in a different light. I believe that it is more effective for people to work together when teachers assign projects. This is because they are able to get good job opportunities and collect valuable information.
First of all, working together as a project member is more effective because they are able to get good job opportunities. To be specific, while projects in the past are small to handle by one person, today’s projects could not be handled by one person, should be handled by as a group holding a lot of people. This trend makes companies in modern society prefer people who have experienced a great deal of group project. For example, when I was in university, I have tried to do group programming projects as a leader of many groups. During progressing projects, I and my members were trying to find out effective ways to develop programs. Eventually, our groups got the first prize of programming competitions. Thus, this proves that the more effective way to learn a lot from projects is to work together with others.
Moreover, the more effective ways to learn a lot from projects enables people to collect a lot of information. In addition, in today’s fast-paced world, projects are required to have huge and valuable information. However, the time for doing projects is limited and working alone could not collect a lot of valuable information from the Internet. Thus, people should make a group for the project assigned and they should maximize their time to collect a lot of valuable information as a group. For instance, in Samsung electronics corporations where I am engaged in, a lot of projects have done by professional groups, which require many technologies to apply. They work each other for succeeding their projects within limited given time and also collect valuable information effectively in order to apply new technologies. Their quality of projects has also improved during the project time. Eventually, many group projects are succeeded in business market, which as a result got the best prize of Korea industry development. This is because they effectively support each other to develop their projects. As a result, I learned that students should practice themselves as a member of groups in order to collect a lot of valuable information and further, to succeed in their projects.
To sum up, I believe that working together is essential for people to learn much effectively than working alone : helping them get good job opportunities and collecting a lot of valuable information. Consequently, the importance of my views cannot be underestimated in that it can kill two birds with one stone for the reasons I have mentioned above. This trend will probably continue for the next generations.
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'in general', 'such as', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.223570190641 0.229887763892 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.185441941075 0.158761421928 117% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0762564991334 0.0866891130778 88% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0623916811092 0.046263068375 135% => OK
Pronouns: 0.051993067591 0.0685040099705 76% => OK
Prepositions: 0.124783362218 0.118717715034 105% => OK
Participles: 0.0467937608319 0.0351676179071 133% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.89466669694 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0433275563258 0.0309702414327 140% => OK
Particles: 0.00346620450607 0.00188951952338 183% => OK
Determiners: 0.0693240901213 0.0887237588012 78% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0173310225303 0.0209618222197 83% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0190641247834 0.0139019557991 137% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3106.0 2387.08602151 130% => OK
No of words: 517.0 408.028673835 127% => OK
Chars per words: 6.00773694391 5.86048508987 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.48200974243 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.369439071567 0.338922669872 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.297872340426 0.251872472559 118% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.201160541586 0.174417080927 115% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.121856866538 0.112833075102 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89466669694 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.419729206963 0.524397521467 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.0234606773 59.2087087015 81% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6684587814 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.68 20.5533526081 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7311094306 48.84282405 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.24 120.699889404 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.68 20.5533526081 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.68 0.644075263715 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.54480286738 0% => OK
Readability: 50.4672340426 45.7405998639 110% => OK
Elegance: 1.31791907514 1.45489161554 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202510113247 0.300154397459 67% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.120573868871 0.103427244359 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.131768365593 0.0752933317313 175% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.464042960791 0.497263757937 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.106748583186 0.151897553556 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809345475586 0.114077575197 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880835737062 0.0781384742642 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.417887364846 0.336927656856 124% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0826456930304 0.067059652881 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150034378639 0.210909579961 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439620530431 0.0618886996521 71% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8870967742 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.86379928315 26% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.91756272401 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 14.0 8.42114695341 166% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.6433691756 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.