Every one have their own preferred way to study and work on assigned projects, and each have their own weaknesses and strength. I disagree with teachers assigning projects on which students must work together, rather than working individually. Someone can consciously weigh the pros and cons of each side. The reasons will be explored in the following essay.
To begin with, assigning projects in group work lead to some students taking advantage of others, and this is absolutely unfair. When a student depends on his partner to do most of the duties, another one have to complete both jobs. Reckless and irresponsible behavior is shown here. This act is very annoying to an excellent student who is aiming to achieve a maximum score. For, example, a group project in a biology class where it consists of three members. One student should be responsible for collecting the material and resources, another student will prepare for the research, and the third one is responsible to proofread. However, if one of the students was with a lower IQ or decides that he is not going to finalize perfectly his part, then the overall mark would be dramatically affected. All the students here are taken down deeply to drown in the deep ocean of failure.
Another noticeable measure is that sometimes group assignments are a waste of time. Usually group members are close partners also in their daily life, and they hang out together after school and practice various activities. So, the time that is meant to be to complete their duties would be wasted talking on random personal issues. When things get personal, it ruins the professionalism in the results. Students working on the same biology project mentioned above are most probably expected to spend more time chatting than doing an advantageous job. This group may even find it hard to complete their responsibilities before the due date of presentation.
Finally, group assignments lack the touch of perfection in the presentation of the project. The last most important step in a successful project is the way it is presented. Each student have his own perspective and way of analyzing various criteria. Thus, every student see the project from his angle. Different personalities is equal to an aimless and complicated result. Also, not all of the partners are able to be fully satisfied and amused. If the group members are not confident about their work, then how would they be able to convince their teacher and colleagues and get the score that each one of them truly deserves. Therefore, this result in an unpersuasive assignment.
As a conclusion, group assignments are not the preferred way to me. All folks should bear in mind that to individualize work with someone's own personality is the guaranteed method for success. The project would be signed with the uniqueness of each personality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 384, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...mless and complicated result. Also, not all of the partners are able to be fully satisfied...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, third, thus, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2391.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 474.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04430379747 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8198355169 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533755274262 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 730.8 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0231473052 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4482758621 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3448275862 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75862068966 5.45110844103 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240679706336 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061702395695 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782983219211 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138199555603 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602202860945 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => The average readability is low. Need to improve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.