There are certain factors or considerations that every one should take into account in working on assigned projects, and each have their own weaknesses and strength. I disagree with teachers assigning projects on which students must work together, rather than working individually. Someone can consciously weigh the pros and cons of each side. The reasons will be explored in the following essay.
To begin with, assigning projects in group work lead to some students taking advantage of others, and this is absolutely unfair. A lazy student depends on his partner to do most of the duties. A reckless and irresponsible behavior would be shown. This act is very annoying to an excellent student who is aiming to achieve a maximum score. A group project in a biology class is a perfect example to illustrate this. One student should be responsible for collecting the material needed, another student will prepare for the research, and another one is responsible to proofread. However, if one of the students was with a lower IQ or decides that he is not going to finalize perfectly his part, then the overall mark would be dramatically affected. All the students here are taken down deeply to drown in the deep ocean of failure.
Furthermore, sometimes group assignments are a waste of time. Usually group members are close buddies in their daily life, and they hang out together after school. So, the time that is meant to be to complete their duties would be wasted talking on random personal issues. When things get personal it might ruin the professionalism in the results. Students working on the same biology project mentioned above are expected to spend more time talking than doing an advantageous job. This causes an unprofessional project, that is if their were even able to finish before the due time to submit their work.
Admittedly, there are some justifications by one who argues that group assignments enhance and stimulate positive communication between the members of the group. Students share their ideas and suggestions, in order to get the highest score that they deserve. However, still I affirm that working in groups harm the students more than helping them. Group assignments lack the touch of perfection in the presentation of the project. The last most important step in a successful project is the way it is presented for everyone. Each student have his own perspective and way of analyzing what he is supposed to do. Thus, every student see the project from his angle. Different personalities is equal to a lost and complicated goal to reach, that not all of them are able to be fully satisfied with it. If the group members are not confident about their work, then how would they be able to convince their teacher and colleagues and get the score that each one of them truly deserves. All what they worked for would result in an unpersuasive assignment.
Due to aforementioned ground, all folks should bear in mind that group assignments are not the preferred way and students will not learn more effectively than working alone. Most students definitely prefer to individualize their work with their own personality. The project would be signed with the uniqueness of each one's point of view.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...sted talking on random personal issues. When things get personal it might ruin the p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, still, then, thus, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 15.1003584229 212% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2697.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 539.0 407.700716846 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00371057514 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81833721656 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78597236446 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 212.727598566 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508348794063 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 822.6 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.6003584229 150% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1106118384 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3870967742 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.29032258065 5.45110844103 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305793265541 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826360096161 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865314806609 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193406679136 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455408106261 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes. We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.