TPO 36 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children five to ten years old than to spend money on universities

Nowadays, there has been a heated discussion on whether the government should give funds to higher education or secondary education. Personally, I believe that it is hugely beneficial to invest money in university education. I feel this way for several reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, in recent years, higher education is costly for most families, accordingly, limiting the number of students who want to receive a college degree. The nation's development depends on the technically young working class, who hold a university or college diploma. Therefore, it is critically important to expand the opportunity for all high school students across the country by providing as much funding as possible for universities. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. About seven years ago, I got accepted to a university in my country. However, it was hard for my parents to pay for my school and living expenses in an expensive city. Fortunately, the government has implemented a support policy for my university. As a result, my tuition is reduced by half, and I also got other scholarships because of my excellent academic results to afford my living costs.
Secondly, investing in higher education helps to promote scientific research and improve the quality of graduate students. The money can be used to upgrade expensive research facilities, expand libraries, build more self-study rooms, and invest in research for faculty members. Consequently, many studies have been conducted and have the opportunity to apply to practice. Along with that, many students are involved in early research and gain experience as soon as possible. For instance, I am pursuing a master's degree in a developed country where the government invests a lot of money in universities. My current school receives research grants from the state to carry out several projects. By implementing such plans, graduate students like me will not only earn a stipend but also develop their experience while doing research. A few studies conducted have been commercialized as technologies related to mobile 5G technology. This is why the country I am studying is one of the leading countries in the world of 5G technology.
In conclusion, I believe that it is vital to spend money to universities rather than to secondary education. This is because higher education plays an essential role in the nation's development by strengthening its skilled workforce and developing research to help boost the economy.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (4 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 164, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...o want to receive a college degree. The nations development depends on the technically ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 173, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ducation plays an essential role in the nations development by strengthening its skille...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2119.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25806451613 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06187990005 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565756823821 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2159551868 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3181818182 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3181818182 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.54545454545 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212348194193 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577577893203 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049700701367 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124084238233 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00945373243487 0.0645574589148 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.