Whether teachers where more appreciated and valued in the past than they nowadays is controversial question. Some think that teachers today are more competitive than before. They argue that modern teachers have advanced skills and knowledge, However, in my opinion, I think that they are more respected in the past.
First, students are much relying on the internet to get information and to acquire knowledge than they used to be and therefore they are not valuating teachers. Internet has provided easy access to whatever information students need in a convenient way. Hence, students will not wait till they get to classrooms to ask teachers about clarification for their concerns. Instead they will go directly and search for that explanation on the internet, and in second they can get a bunch of articles related to that topic. For example, in the past, in order for college students to find a solution for a complicated mathematical function, they had wait until they get to the class to seek the answer. In contrast, they can find a detailed response for that function on the internet and from more than reliable resource. Therefore students do not give that importance to teachers as they did before.
Second, there were a few teachers in the past. Most people were workers and farmers; and only a few talented students could pass the exam and become professors. However, now there are plenty of teachers and professors with different academic levels and capabilities. This simply explains why teachers used to be more valued than they today. For example, when professors entered the classroom, students had to stand up and show respect. Nowadays, students do not care much about their instructors. A small number of students are appreciating their teachers. Therefore instructors are less respected and appreciated than they used to be.
In conclusion, teachers are valued a lot in the past as they were indispensable and less available.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 233, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a convenient way" with adverb for "convenient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...s to whatever information students need in a convenient way. Hence, students will not wait till the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 368, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...about clarification for their concerns. Instead they will go directly and search for th...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 814, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...t and from more than reliable resource. Therefore students do not give that importance to...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 497, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: A few; Some
... not care much about their instructors. A small number of students are appreciating their teacher...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...udents are appreciating their teachers. Therefore instructors are less respected and appr...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 319.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12852664577 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81397512249 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498432601881 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.0 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1840432228 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1052631579 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7894736842 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94736842105 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233176218928 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900299233325 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605701149225 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176089626657 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419176258628 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.