It is universally acknowledged that work is an essential component of one's life. Some individuals hold the belief that workers could be more satisfied when they have various tasks to do during the workday, while others claim that spending all day on similar tasks is much more attractive. Weighing pros and cons of each side of this topic, I prefer the former one that it is far more beneficial for workers to deal with different types of tasks during the workday. The explanations go as follows.
To begin with, workers are more likely to learn a variety of skills by doing different tasks during the workday, which is significant for them to make progress in their careers. Just imagine that if workers could handle only one specific task while working, they may just get touch with the skills of the specific step. As a result, they may just be familiar to the knowledge of one specific step of his or her work, so that they will lose the opportunities to work in more advanced fields of his or her work, which means that they will stay stable on the specific positon that they are familiar with. On the contrary, if workers could spend their time on various aspects of their work, then they would get access to distinctive knowledge every day. In this way, they would pick up a large number of skills during their workdays, which is beneficial for them to work in more advanced positions to obtain success in their career.
In addition, it will not be bored if workers could get involved in various types of tasks during the workday, which will finally improve the efficiency of the whole company. It is widely accepted that everyone will get bored and tired if they deal with only one task during the whole day, which will slow down the speed of their work. Moreover, the quality of their work will be affected, which is a terrible news to the company. However, if the company could allocate different tasks to every specific worker, then they will be more energetic while working, which in turn improve the efficiency of the whole company.
An additional support which comes to my mind is that workers will meet much more different people if they can work on different tasks. To be more specific, they can jump out from the original circle of their friends and make more brand new friends by working in different positions. Therefore, they can develop new hobbies and interests in their fresh friendships and live in a happier and wonderful life.
To sum up, it is more profitable for works to handle various types of tasks during the workday since the advantages on their careers, working efficiency and personal life. Judging from aforementioned ground including the three prime and conspicuous justifications, I definitely prefer that workers are supposed to deal with different types of tasks during the workday.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... that work is an essential component of ones life. Some individuals hold the belief ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 783, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ry day. In this way, they would pick up a large number of skills during their workdays, which is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'terrible news'.
Suggestion: terrible news
...f their work will be affected, which is a terrible news to the company. However, if the company...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, in addition, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2347.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 488.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80942622951 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48547159184 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43237704918 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 709.2 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.6372691044 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.388888889 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1111111111 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323489658264 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118593372213 0.076458572812 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940021987542 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21103637147 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0815779429793 0.0645574589148 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.