The most crucial section of most people life is their carrier since it may represent them to their surroundings and is part of their identification as well. Therefore, it requires very meticulous observation to perceive how we can impose our best in working time and what can get inferred as the most beneficial system of delivering tasks which provides the situation for our thriving. A controversial question which often raised is, whether it is more satisfying for workers to do many different types of tasks each day or they prefer similar tasks all day long? In my perspective, by handling one task all day long we can imply our job in a more satisfying way and get a more remarkable outcome as a result.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that the best outcome comes from a solid and systematic strategy which needs to get modified through time in any jobs. Therefore, repeating a particular task all day time will provide enough time for them to assess their failure and ameliorate their implements. In the cast of this strategy, a worker can impose his/her tasks in its optimum efficiency. The noteworthy recent statistics which has been released from the Business department of Boston University claims that handling various jobs for an individual may engender chaotic nonefficient results which endanger the whole business. They notified the inefficient results may put the workers psychologically in the negative state which itself causes more tension and work anxiety. No one can neglect the fact that the emotional state of a human being who is a worker, in this case, is the utmost factor in their performance which will get diminished in the aforementioned situation.
Another reason which deserves some words is that the young generation of workers are fundamental pillars of every society and need to get prime in a proper manner. If we exclusively take Their preferences into the account, we still see the compelling reasons to repute doing the various job each day. For instance, when you start your work life after school there is no doubt that your presentation will get improved through time but if you are asked to carry many jobs in a day, you won't get proper time to flourish as a proficient person in all of those tasks. Consequently, if you change your job after a while, you cannot deliver any of those tasks that you did before in an appropriate way. It will waste your time and halt you from approaching your desired future. In the worst case scenario, you may disappoint your employee, end up getting fired.
To wrap it up, if one contemplates all the merits and demerits of the ways that a worker carries a task, will soon realize that having many tasks during a day may cause a chaotic work system with the least benefits for the entire system. Besides, it damages the workers who are new in any market and keep them away from being skilled enough for their further jobs. The inevitable question is whether we need to dodge making the damaging consequences that handling different tasks may entail or still we need to stick to a hectic workday.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 483, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...it is more satisfying for workers to do many different types of tasks each day or they prefer ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper manner" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... of every society and need to get prime in a proper manner. If we exclusively take Their preferenc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 674, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate way" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... any of those tasks that you did before in an appropriate way. It will waste your time and halt you f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, while, for instance, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2569.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 531.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83804143126 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80035803286 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68747797548 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514124293785 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 799.2 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.2859022277 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.210526316 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9473684211 20.6045352989 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215534420847 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683819466845 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878819272439 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135256164274 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640975526857 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.