When it comes to correcting other people's mistakes, people in general only correct them within their minds instead of telling their ideas to them. Relatively few people correct them immediately by interrupting. As for me, the best and appropriate way is to wait until they are available to listen to my opinions.
Clearly, it is rude to interrupt while people are delivering a speech, or during a meeting.
Certainly, audience may harbor considerable questions in their minds during meetings or classes. Although teachers are always willing to discuss with their students, it is still not polite to discontinue class. The timing of discussing with professor is crucial. As a result, a feasible approach is to discuss in the Q&A sections, or after the class or meeting. My English professor is a great example for this criteria. She was a new professor in our department, which means she had quite few teaching experiences. My classmate, Judy, is a hardworking student who always preview before attending every class, and she always ask a bunch of questions during every class. Some of her questions are critical whereas some are shallow. Professor's teaching schedule was delayed significantly due to those questions, and it does have harmful impacts to other students. Professor taught our class much less compared to her other class. Even though we could study on our own, the professor’s teaching style helped us learn English more efficiently. Therefore, it is somehow unequal for other students.
Moreover, it is proper to prepare before asking a question. Whenever I conceive a question related to class or meeting which I attend to, I always write down those questions. Then after the class or meeting, I re-think my question and do some research for related materials in order to figure out possible explanations on my own, or to verify my doubts. This is meaningful to me before asking the teacher or the meeting leader since there is a great chance that I misunderstand their meaning, or I had incorrect or insufficient knowledge. After all, teachers and meeting leaders are much more familiar with the topic they are discussed. Thus, I will organize my doubts and acquire background knowledge before discussion for improving the quality of discussion.
Accordingly, I prefer to waiting until the class or meeting is over and the teacher or the meeting leader is finally free for discussing about their controversial opinions, rather than correct the mistake right away through interruption, or say nothing about their incorrectness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nglish professor is a great example for this criteria. She was a new professor in ou...
^^^^
Line 3, column 626, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'asks'.
Suggestion: asks
...e attending every class, and she always ask a bunch of questions during every class...
^^^
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: PREFER_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'wait'?
Suggestion: wait
...f discussion. Accordingly, I prefer to waiting until the class or meeting is over and ...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'finally', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'therefore', 'thus', 'whereas', 'while', 'after all', 'as for', 'as to', 'in general', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.207708779443 0.229887763892 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.162740899358 0.158761421928 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0770877944325 0.0866891130778 89% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0599571734475 0.046263068375 130% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0963597430407 0.0685040099705 141% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.10278372591 0.118717715034 87% => OK
Participles: 0.0385438972163 0.0351676179071 110% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.9299541702 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0406852248394 0.0309702414327 131% => OK
Particles: 0.00428265524625 0.00188951952338 227% => OK
Determiners: 0.0749464668094 0.0887237588012 84% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00642398286938 0.0209618222197 31% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0107066381156 0.0139019557991 77% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2548.0 2387.08602151 107% => OK
No of words: 413.0 408.028673835 101% => OK
Chars per words: 6.16949152542 5.86048508987 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48200974243 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.409200968523 0.338922669872 121% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.317191283293 0.251872472559 126% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.215496368039 0.174417080927 124% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.142857142857 0.112833075102 127% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9299541702 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55205811138 0.524397521467 105% => OK
Word variations: 64.0347061027 59.2087087015 108% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6684587814 111% => OK
Sentence length: 17.9565217391 20.5533526081 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1383937065 48.84282405 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.782608696 120.699889404 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9565217391 20.5533526081 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.739130434783 0.644075263715 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 49.6756500684 45.7405998639 109% => OK
Elegance: 1.09395973154 1.45489161554 75% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413819870841 0.300154397459 138% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0909443858037 0.103427244359 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0590385189282 0.0752933317313 78% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.43751331057 0.497263757937 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.214709018542 0.151897553556 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125435582435 0.114077575197 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116210032938 0.0781384742642 149% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.285612584466 0.336927656856 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0948935320987 0.067059652881 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266077841098 0.210909579961 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108981540746 0.0618886996521 176% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8870967742 50% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.86379928315 207% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.91756272401 183% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 2.0 8.42114695341 24% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.4623655914 162% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 2.75985663082 254% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.6433691756 95% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.