In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Some people think we will use cars less in twenty years from now, while others argue that demand for automobiles will increase in future. In my opinion the first statement is true for multiple reasons which are financial, technological and psychological.
Financially, the price of nonrenewable fuels such as gasoline keep going up and people would find it more economical to use public transportation. Besides, due to environmental concerns governments will impose more taxes on fossil fuels. That would make automobiles unaffordable for many people.
From technological perspective, expected advances in technology will provide more efficient public transportation systems especially in large cities. Therefore, development of various types of public transportation such as subways, LRTs and etc. makes it easier to have access to every corner of the cities. For instance, the studies show that in my hometown, Tehran, the subway will be the first choice for transportation within 10 years. The reasons are clear; the numbers of Tehran subway lines and stations are growing rapidly. Besides, it is planned that more modern wagons to be added to the subway system. That would allow people to reach every neighborhood in Tehran in shorter time every year.
Psychologically, people are becoming more and more overwhelmed with troubles of living in metropolises. They are definitely unhappy with time spent waiting in traffic or searching for parking lots, so they might be willing to give up their cars and rely on public transportation which will be more developed in future.
To sum up, in the near future there will be fewer cars in use than today because more people will realize that owning an automobile is costly and using public transportation will be more convenient.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...at demand for automobiles will increase in future. In my opinion the first statement is t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ic transportation such as subways, LRTs and etc. makes it easier to have access to every...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 308, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...sportation which will be more developed in future. To sum up, in the near future there w...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, so, therefore, while, for instance, in short, such as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 282.0 407.700716846 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31914893617 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03017037448 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578014184397 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2762037919 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306197977885 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806192271704 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120694664509 0.0737576698707 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184829643673 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138062397656 0.0645574589148 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.