Universities should spend more money in buying facilities than hiring famous professors.
At the turn of the new century with the development of human's modern society, people more and more tend to promote the level of their education and no one can turn a blind eye to the direct and indirect effects of universities on blooming and thriving societies. A simple recognition of this argument lends our discussion to questions of how government can improve universities' ranking. Although some people adhere to this belief that hiring famous professors can be highly beneficial, in my vantage point, allocating more money to buy new facilities can leave profound effects on student's success since it fortifies students' tendencies to work hard, and also it can attract ingenious students.
The first aspect to point out is that what provokes universities to spend more money for buying new facilities is strengthening students' motivation. As a matter of fact, in the competitive world of today, students need to work hard to make headway in academic lives. That is why universities should give strong incentives to their students in order to make constant efforts. Take a case of despondent students who suffer from outdated computers in university for instance. Should the university provides an opportunity with students to access developed computers with high speed internet connection, students will try hard and determine far objectives to bring success for their university. Not only can they enrich their knowledge by hunting information on Net, but also they can contact with famous professors from different prestigious universities. Hence, improving universities' facilities brings promising future for students.
The further subtle point is that attracting ingenious students from different corners of world can be considered another advantage of improving universities' facilities. It is absolutely undeniable, at the 20th and 21st centuries, universities try to attract students who may have extraordinary future and can help university to raise its ranking in the world. Without a shadow of doubt, universities need to improving facilities which can attract students. To illustrate more, in my country, there is an entrance exam which is taken annually in order to choose intelligent students; then students opt for their future universities which are well-reputed. Therefore universities need to improve their facilities.
On the whole, according to above-mentioned points and details, it is crystal-clear that enhancing universities' facilities can be useful since it inspires students to work hard, and also it attracts smart students. It is high time we stopped overlooking the fact that just famous professors can raise universities ‘ranking. Have you ever seen prestigious university without diligent students? Can you consider a university prosperous without developed facilities? Absolutely I believe no!
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 582, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...acilities can leave profound effects on students success since it fortifies students ten...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 129, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... buying new facilities is strengthening students motivation. As a matter of fact, in the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: NEED_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'need to improve'?
Suggestion: need to improve
...Without a shadow of doubt, universities need to improving facilities which can attract students. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 655, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...re universities which are well-reputed. Therefore universities need to improve their faci...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'well', 'for instance', 'as a matter of fact', 'on the whole']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.264830508475 0.229887763892 115% => OK
Verbs: 0.167372881356 0.158761421928 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0974576271186 0.0866891130778 112% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0360169491525 0.046263068375 78% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0487288135593 0.0685040099705 71% => OK
Prepositions: 0.108050847458 0.118717715034 91% => OK
Participles: 0.0402542372881 0.0351676179071 114% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.14520651273 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0466101694915 0.0309702414327 150% => OK
Particles: 0.0021186440678 0.00188951952338 112% => OK
Determiners: 0.0593220338983 0.0887237588012 67% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0360169491525 0.0209618222197 172% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0190677966102 0.0139019557991 137% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2837.0 2387.08602151 119% => OK
No of words: 431.0 408.028673835 106% => OK
Chars per words: 6.58236658933 5.86048508987 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48200974243 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.438515081206 0.338922669872 129% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.350348027842 0.251872472559 139% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.294663573086 0.174417080927 169% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.213457076566 0.112833075102 189% => Too many words length more than 8 chars.
Word Length SD: 3.14520651273 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524361948956 0.524397521467 100% => OK
Word variations: 59.9819413324 59.2087087015 101% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6684587814 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.55 20.5533526081 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.1448346684 48.84282405 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.85 120.699889404 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.55 20.5533526081 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.7 0.644075263715 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.54480286738 72% => OK
Readability: 56.5848027842 45.7405998639 124% => OK
Elegance: 1.63865546218 1.45489161554 113% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19533950177 0.300154397459 65% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.120832586286 0.103427244359 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.076712537059 0.0752933317313 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.470649173582 0.497263757937 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.147450515028 0.151897553556 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757293858835 0.114077575197 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500839438746 0.0781384742642 64% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.442563885606 0.336927656856 131% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0746632300261 0.067059652881 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135572894381 0.210909579961 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382729293921 0.0618886996521 62% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8870967742 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.91756272401 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 14.0 8.42114695341 166% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.6433691756 139% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.