Universities should spend more money on facilities (such as computer lab and technology in general) rather than on hiring some famous professors.
Since the dawn of civilizations, universities have played significant role in societies. It is completely clear that the foundation of universities is lying on 2 main pillars, namely professors and facilities. In recent decades, this observation has led to a controversial question which is often raised regarding these two, and the way authorities in university must prioritize them. Some people are inclined toward the opinion that facilities like computer labs and alike, are more important and deserve more financing; while others look at this debate through a different lens, and assign more value to hiring famous professors. Personally I am more in agreement with the latter one. In the following paragraphs, three conspicuous reasons will cogently substantiate my perspective.
The first noteworthy point regarding the issue is the experiences and abilities of well-known professors to educate students. The main reason for establishing a university is leaning something new. Students will come to University to learn, and learning will not be achieved solely through good equipment. For example imagine that a student has enrolled in university with best available facilities and laboratories. Although, this person is in a very promising environment, if he cannot reach a teacher with suitable capability to learn from; then, all these gadgets will be just expensive toys. In reality and for learning, if you have good professor and nothing else, you can learn, maybe with difficulty, but you can. On the other hand, if you have best technologies but no one to learn from, then in reality you will learn nothing.
Another reason which deserves some words here is the ability of famous professor to gather more money and financial supply for any university. Imagine a company that want to run a study on specific subject, something like new drug for cancer. if you were the CEO of this firm which you would choose: a good lab with cutting age technology but a very ordinary professor at the head who has no worthy academic finding or important work in science, or an ordinary lab with a very famous professor at the head, someone who already has shown his ability to do scientific experiment and reaching promising result at the end of study. I think as a CEO, a person responsible for company success, you will definitely choose the second scenario. Hence, this perspective in managers and owners of firms and companies will lead to absorption of more money in universities with famous names in their catalogues. Then, these universities can use this more money, and supply the professors with better tools.
Finally, in addition to what was mentioned above, as recent studies have revealed students choose their university not based on labs and facilities, but according to persons and professors who are teaching there. For example, a recent study which was conducted on one thousand first year students in USA, shows that roughly 70 percent of these students choose their university based on the professors who are there. the result of this study is proof for this hypothesis that famous names attracts more students, and the number of young people who want to enroll in universities with famed professors is more than students who prefer high quality facilities and equipment. Moreover this high enrolment requests can bring more financial supply for university, an additional budget that is very.
To make a long story short, all of the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that hiring famous professors for university is more important than equip this university with cutting edge technology. However, that was a story in a nutshell; actually, there are some other reasons and examples, challenging the claim, which are not mentioned above. Finally, it is suggested that a survey be conducted to find out the exact factors involved in this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 368, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the best'.
Suggestion: with the best
...at a student has enrolled in university with best available facilities and laboratories. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 748, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the best'.
Suggestion: have the best
... but you can. On the other hand, if you have best technologies but no one to learn from, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...ct, something like new drug for cancer. if you were the CEO of this firm which you...
^^
Line 4, column 416, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... based on the professors who are there. the result of this study is proof for this ...
^^^
Line 4, column 496, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is hypothesis that famous names attracts more students, and the number of young p...
^^
Line 4, column 673, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... high quality facilities and equipment. Moreover this high enrolment requests can bring ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...t is very. To make a long story short, all of the aforementioned reasons lead us to the c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'regarding', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'i think', 'in addition', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.245337159254 0.229887763892 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.143472022956 0.158761421928 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.090387374462 0.0866891130778 104% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0602582496413 0.046263068375 130% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0286944045911 0.0685040099705 42% => OK
Prepositions: 0.120516499283 0.118717715034 102% => OK
Participles: 0.0444763271162 0.0351676179071 126% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.86092349793 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0243902439024 0.0309702414327 79% => OK
Particles: 0.00143472022956 0.00188951952338 76% => OK
Determiners: 0.0989956958393 0.0887237588012 112% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0200860832138 0.0209618222197 96% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0215208034433 0.0139019557991 155% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3877.0 2387.08602151 162% => OK
No of words: 628.0 408.028673835 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.17356687898 5.86048508987 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.00598923014 4.48200974243 112% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.37898089172 0.338922669872 112% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.285031847134 0.251872472559 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.227707006369 0.174417080927 131% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.167197452229 0.112833075102 148% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86092349793 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 309.0 212.727598566 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492038216561 0.524397521467 94% => OK
Word variations: 61.6908595467 59.2087087015 104% => OK
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6684587814 126% => OK
Sentence length: 24.1538461538 20.5533526081 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.5938768306 48.84282405 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.115384615 120.699889404 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 20.5533526081 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.769230769231 0.644075263715 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.54480286738 126% => OK
Readability: 52.6570308672 45.7405998639 115% => OK
Elegance: 1.76543209877 1.45489161554 121% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238904815531 0.300154397459 80% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.106225519399 0.103427244359 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.106029751942 0.0752933317313 141% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.458012578139 0.497263757937 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.126314130729 0.151897553556 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836991225968 0.114077575197 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576250691689 0.0781384742642 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.371028104862 0.336927656856 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0302145444682 0.067059652881 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165961728808 0.210909579961 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571713003581 0.0618886996521 92% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8870967742 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.91756272401 142% => OK
Positive topic words: 14.0 8.42114695341 166% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.75985663082 181% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.6433691756 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.