Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Throughout the history, both contentment in life and having a decent job have been accounted as perennial concerns for the human. Therefore, it is not far-fetched to presume that these two elements have highly impact on each other. However, which type of work brings more satisfacion for individuals is depends on the lens through which one is looking. There is a growing segment of people who contend this idea that diversity in reponsibility makes people more happy that mundane daily routine tasks. I personally concur with this idea, and in the ensuing paragraph the rationale behind this opinion will be further elaborated.
First and most exquisite poiint comming to the mind to substantiate my stand point is concerned with the nature of human which is inclined to experience various things. Hardly can anyone deny the fact that people's lives should be alined iwth their urges. In fact, having had certain desires, people should respond to them correctly, and this issue assured their happiness. As an illustration, children in ealy age has an intense inclination to disruct the things. Indeed, they meet this instinct urge by breaking off their toys. Undoubtedly, this simple example can be generalized to mayrids facets and stages of lives. Therefore, people would not be happy in their lifes, if they felt stability. This reluctant to stay in a determined circumstances hinder individuals to get involved in a routine acitivity that will not make any difference in their lives.
Another vital issue which should be taken into consideration is the matter of progress in life. Needless to say that every sing step which is being taken by individuals requires having particulat stimulus. Admittedly, promotion is the primitive inspiration for the overwhelming majority of individuals. Take this fact in mind that if people want to promote in their job, it is necessary to acquire profeciency in their career. Take a juveniles who starts his job as a newly gradulated in the company. In the first place he undertakes the minor tasks. Having corroborated his capabilities, the young man will be take an opportunity to work in a wider area by accepting more reponsibilities. Apparently, by pursuing this path, the youth will stand a ood chance to promote.
To wrap it up, it is more judicious to say that ingaging in mere defined daily tasks keep away the individuals from being happy in their life. Not only does is not approach compatible with the nature of human which is willing to experience a wide array of situations, but also impede people to progree in their lives which is the origin of sadness in life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'impacted'.
Suggestion: impacted
...ume that these two elements have highly impact on each other. However, which type of w...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 477, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion to disruct the things. Indeed, they meet this instinct urge by breaking off ...
^^
Line 2, column 738, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'circumstance'?
Suggestion: circumstance
... This reluctant to stay in a determined circumstances hinder individuals to get involved in a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a juvenile' or simply 'juveniles'?
Suggestion: a juvenile; juveniles
...quire profeciency in their career. Take a juveniles who starts his job as a newly gradulate...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 747, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ursuing this path, the youth will stand a ood chance to promote. To wrap it up,...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, in fact, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2190.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 435.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03448275862 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82962266634 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558620689655 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 693.9 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0583762653 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2173913043 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9130434783 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17391304348 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0633695913312 0.236089414692 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0190232502402 0.076458572812 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0211756773287 0.0737576698707 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0409207203546 0.150856017488 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0115813093448 0.0645574589148 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.