Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during workday than when they do similar task all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Of all the buildings we live in or the products we use every day are related directly with workers, working all the hours to have an honorable and decent life. Even though I have serious doubts on whether we are able to improve their life by giving them wide variety of work instead of one repetitive task or not, instead we will have a better society only when we have strong working class. To reach this point and related to this question worker could be given a broader range of work to mitigate their pains with having a better skills to find a better job.
First and foremost workers can do a good skill if only they have experiences in many fields of study, just like a college professor. For instance, as I remember we have one worker in our company who has skills in vast stretches of work. Because he have been working in construction as a bricklayer, and plumber, even as a supervisor in the position of an engineer. When he first came to our company, he asked a salary as much as our boss. As he was expert in mechanical facilities which we wanted urgently we had to employ him and we did so. So I learned no matter what you studied or worked, you can make money by training yourself in wide variety of fields.
Moreover, having to do the same thing all the working hours can cause problems. Because of nature of repetitive work worker can get tired and bored and this could cause extreme effects on health condition of workers. My uncle is a paragon of this issue, for he had to do the thing all day long, in spite of warning of all family, he work with tailoring machine twelve hours a day and finally one day his finger got injured very seriously that doctors had to cut it off. While he had the chance to change his job and work with us in our company, where many different task are available to do, he went through the tough experience like that. Once I thought that that was his work responsible for the injury and I was right.
To sum up, it is obvious that we don't have enough opportunity of jobs in this country; still we can improve our worker's life with the potential solution just mentioned above. By giving broader range of work and therefore training them to have a decent life and not having hurt in their working.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a better skills to find a better job. First and foremost workers can do a good...
^^
Line 2, column 250, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...s in vast stretches of work. Because he have been working in construction as a brick...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng yourself in wide variety of fields. Moreover, having to do the same thing al...
^^
Line 3, column 553, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... and work with us in our company, where many different task are available to do, he went throu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 34, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ight. To sum up, it is obvious that we dont have enough opportunity of jobs in this...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['finally', 'first', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'while', 'for instance', 'in spite of', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.202222222222 0.229887763892 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.157777777778 0.158761421928 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0822222222222 0.0866891130778 95% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0577777777778 0.046263068375 125% => OK
Pronouns: 0.102222222222 0.0685040099705 149% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.128888888889 0.118717715034 109% => OK
Participles: 0.0355555555556 0.0351676179071 101% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.33016319023 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0333333333333 0.0309702414327 108% => OK
Particles: 0.00444444444444 0.00188951952338 235% => OK
Determiners: 0.08 0.0887237588012 90% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0177777777778 0.0209618222197 85% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0133333333333 0.0139019557991 96% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2246.0 2387.08602151 94% => OK
No of words: 418.0 408.028673835 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37320574163 5.86048508987 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48200974243 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.291866028708 0.338922669872 86% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.203349282297 0.251872472559 81% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.11004784689 0.174417080927 63% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0645933014354 0.112833075102 57% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33016319023 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511961722488 0.524397521467 98% => OK
Word variations: 57.3737157921 59.2087087015 97% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6684587814 77% => OK
Sentence length: 26.125 20.5533526081 127% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7456028208 48.84282405 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.375 120.699889404 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 20.5533526081 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6875 0.644075263715 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.54480286738 90% => OK
Readability: 46.4599282297 45.7405998639 102% => OK
Elegance: 1.15384615385 1.45489161554 79% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256273507935 0.300154397459 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.120716639604 0.103427244359 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0655939869033 0.0752933317313 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.523405622014 0.497263757937 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.120807779768 0.151897553556 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988845334548 0.114077575197 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05426535557 0.0781384742642 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.281664032251 0.336927656856 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.00429808817007 0.067059652881 6% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169353374679 0.210909579961 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455394187864 0.0618886996521 74% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8870967742 59% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.86379928315 129% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.91756272401 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 8.42114695341 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 2.4623655914 203% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.6433691756 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.