You have been told that dormitory rooms at your university must be shared by two students. Would you rather have the university assign a student to share a room with you, or would you rather choose your own roommate? Use specific reasons and details to explain your answer.
Depending on personal experience, personality type, and emotional concern, we find that some people hold the idea of choosing their own roommates, while others prefer to let the universities select theirs. From my point of view, it is more advisable to have the school assign one’s roommate rather than allow him to decide one on his own. My arguments for this point are listed as follows.
I agree with the statement that universities should appoint roommates for students since it creates a golden opportunity for them to broaden their knowledge. Naturally, they are bound to learn more about new concepts and sometimes even a whole new culture. It can be illustrated by a concrete example of my cousin and her Korean roommate. After a year of sharing the same room, they were both satisfied to have been assigned together as they gained not only valuable academic knowledge but also interesting facts about the other’s country. At first, my cousin was not happy with the fact that she had to live with a brand new stranger from a different country. But now she even managed to learn some Korean and a few traditional cuisines from her roommate. If she had chosen her only bunkmate, she would have missed the chance to broaden her horizon about other culture. Hence, it is easy to see that having the universities assign roommates for students is a good way for them to acquired more fascinating information.
Another factor contributing to my preference is the fact that letting the university decide one’s roommate is beneficial to students in terms of self-perfection. Needless to say, sharing a room with a stranger is by all means not easy, it requires a person to be responsible and respectful at the same time. Take my friend’s story as an example, he had always been an overindulged child, he never had to take care of his own chores and barely listened to anyone. However, after two years studying abroad and sharing a room with a stranger, he came back as an entirely new person who was independent and understanding. Had he not had the experience of living with an unfamiliar person, he would not have had the chance to acknowledge his weakness and change for the better. Broadly speaking, having schools to appoint one’s bunkmate creates a better chance for students to perfect themselves.
Of course, arguments swill be raised against my standpoint. Some people might argue that choosing their own roommates ensures the chance of them getting along with each other and provides students with emotion supports. Surely, choosing this option has advantages to an extent, but if all these factors are contemplated, the advantages of universities assigning roommates carry more weight than students deciding their own. Because students will have to adjust themselves for the better to adapt to the new life of sharing a room with others; also, an unfamiliar bunkmate can be as much of an emotional support as an acquaintance once they got to know each other. Hence, I believe all the difficulties that can be solved by a chosen roommate can also be handled by a completely new one.
Ultimately, I find myself definitely agree with those who assert that universities should match roommates together. This is because of the valuable knowledge and self-improving opportunities it offers. Therefore it is important that students take these presented ideas into careful considerations so that they can enjoy their stay in college as well as gain more beneficial experiences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 204, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...self-improving opportunities it offers. Therefore it is important that students take thes...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'broadly speaking', 'of course', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.196319018405 0.229887763892 85% => OK
Verbs: 0.173312883436 0.158761421928 109% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0981595092025 0.0866891130778 113% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0567484662577 0.046263068375 123% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0782208588957 0.0685040099705 114% => OK
Prepositions: 0.118098159509 0.118717715034 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0475460122699 0.0351676179071 135% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.89298895416 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0383435582822 0.0309702414327 124% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0920245398773 0.0887237588012 104% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0168711656442 0.0209618222197 80% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00460122699387 0.0139019557991 33% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3522.0 2387.08602151 148% => OK
No of words: 581.0 408.028673835 142% => OK
Chars per words: 6.06196213425 5.86048508987 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90957651803 4.48200974243 110% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.368330464716 0.338922669872 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.278829604131 0.251872472559 111% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.211703958692 0.174417080927 121% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.135972461274 0.112833075102 121% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89298895416 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 285.0 212.727598566 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490533562823 0.524397521467 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 60.0013689858 59.2087087015 101% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6684587814 121% => OK
Sentence length: 23.24 20.5533526081 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6300503967 48.84282405 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.88 120.699889404 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.24 20.5533526081 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.52 0.644075263715 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 51.1229604131 45.7405998639 112% => OK
Elegance: 1.17412935323 1.45489161554 81% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239179332961 0.300154397459 80% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0874847241521 0.103427244359 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0613008936797 0.0752933317313 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.451651041326 0.497263757937 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.11843257776 0.151897553556 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813051251055 0.114077575197 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397304600546 0.0781384742642 51% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.319994335592 0.336927656856 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0870712282851 0.067059652881 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150064737369 0.210909579961 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508258747517 0.0618886996521 82% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8870967742 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.86379928315 129% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.91756272401 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 14.0 8.42114695341 166% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.6433691756 139% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.