You have long been friends with someone. If they do something that you don’t like, should you still be friends with him or her?
From a broad perspective, in the current state of affairs we face, in which people due to their social nature incline to establish various kinds of relationships, it is not far-fetched to presume that frindship is accounted as the most precious relations among them. However, the connection within two friends to what extent is vulnerable is considered as a contentious issue. THere is growing segment of people who contend that friend ship does not equal to having exactly similar point of view in varied facets of life. I personally concur with this idea, and in the ensuing paragraph, the rationale behind this opinion will be firther elaborated.
First and foremost, firndship has a more valuable meaning than mere agreement between two person. There is no denying the fact that intimitation is the backbones for having a decent, long-term friendship. Actually, having got acquiated with each others, peope make decision to become closer. Indeed, they had spent a lot of time together befor become friend. Undoubtedly, there are a lot of circumstances that their opinion were different and this is the issue that distigush people from each other. People learn from their companions to there are some others whom are lovely and repectable regardless of all the disagreements. Take a two friend who decided to vote to two entirely diverse candidate in an election. Their friendship has nothing to do with their political point of view, even it is varied in high degree; hence, they should not aggravate their relations owing to their different insight into the world.
Another vital point which should be taken into consideration is that difference does not absolutely define as a bad point. Needless to say that modern society have assertion to take step twoard the democracy. Disaprroval, in its modern definition, means people should hear their opposit voices without juding them.; thus, people ought to make their effort to generalize this concept to all aspects of their lives. Moreover, if someone had a opposit view and his friends did not think about it, it would be shame of his friend. Actually, each position of disagreement provides an opportunity for people to learn from each other. So, no one should pas up the chance by passing through this unrepeated opportunity without careful consideration. Take the election example as another instance. Hearing the opositve views can clarify their mindset and justifications and also the weaknesses of the side that a person advicate it.
To wrap it up, it is more judicious to say that disagreement in friendship should not end up with break up. Not only this issue is one of the most precious relations in the world, but also people should learn to take advanatages of their disapproval and learn something new.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 92, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'people', 'persons'.
Suggestion: people; persons
...meaning than mere agreement between two person. There is no denying the fact that inti...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 691, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'candidate' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'candidates'.
Suggestion: candidates
...decided to vote to two entirely diverse candidate in an election. Their friendship has no...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...f their lives. Moreover, if someone had a opposit view and his friends did not th...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2322.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 456.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09210526316 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76719282118 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552631578947 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 712.8 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3196142779 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.545454545 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.45110844103 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139184685627 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406021582713 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349118466197 0.0737576698707 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0895384119215 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180788690338 0.0645574589148 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.