according to the most recent research on parenting, caretakers tend to use three strategies for disciplining children. Power, withholding of affection and management
Three different strategies for disciplining children are demonstrated in the reading passage whereas the professor in the listening explains about differences in using power and management as two ways of disciplining. First of all, the reading says that one of the strategies for disciplining children is power; in the other words, using physical punishment; For example preventing child from playing with special toy. The children who are growing up with this method are so aggressive. The speaker, however, agrees with this point and he claims that using power to disciplining children decrease their self-steam. So, parents should avoid this strategy.
Next, the reading states withholding of affection as another strategies of disciplining which means rejecting the child. This kind of treating causes insecurity, nervousness and dependency among children.
The final point in the reading is management technique which means set of special rules that are expressed at the proper age; in this way parents use praise according to special rules. The professor in the listening supports this idea and indicates that not only does the management increase the self- steam in children, but also present as a positive reinforcement would be an effective way for disciplining children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng supports this idea and indicates that not only does the management increase th...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'whereas', 'for example', 'kind of', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.276497695853 0.261695866417 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.184331797235 0.158904122519 116% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0599078341014 0.0723426182421 83% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0322580645161 0.0435111971325 74% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00921658986175 0.0277247811725 33% => OK
Prepositions: 0.147465437788 0.128828473217 114% => OK
Participles: 0.0829493087558 0.0370669169778 224% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.95760104691 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00921658986175 0.0208969081088 44% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00460829493088 0.00154638098197 298% => OK
Determiners: 0.119815668203 0.128158765124 93% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00921658986175 0.0158828679856 58% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0184331797235 0.0114777025283 161% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1290.0 1645.83664459 78% => OK
No of words: 197.0 271.125827815 73% => More words wanted.
Chars per words: 6.54822335025 6.08160592843 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 4.04852973271 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.406091370558 0.374372842146 108% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.345177664975 0.287516216867 120% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.263959390863 0.187439937562 141% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.197969543147 0.113142543107 175% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95760104691 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598984771574 0.539623497131 111% => OK
Word variations: 57.0617248563 53.8517498576 106% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0529801325 69% => OK
Sentence length: 21.8888888889 21.7502111507 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.362268024 49.3711431718 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.333333333 132.220823453 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 21.7502111507 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.11111111111 0.878197800319 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 56.4066553864 50.5018328374 112% => OK
Elegance: 2.24489795918 1.90840788429 118% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336792302079 0.451937469235 75% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.11309209476 0.142949733639 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.103105847765 0.0787303798458 131% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.594783204829 0.631733273073 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.189245943097 0.139662658121 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152060225646 0.21790590567 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077996284554 0.0871468918476 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.295273376337 0.414875509568 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0310383656815 0.0530846634433 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249125267949 0.332364718235 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322872338234 0.0446026805963 72% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.62251655629 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 10.2958057395 58% => OK
---------------------
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.