Apparently, there has been a debate about the difficulty of the studying of the old culture in Britain, and the challenges that face the archaeologists in this country. The professor in the lecture talks about a new guideline that helps control and overcome these challenges that had been faced the archeological work, and how these new rules support the archeological work in different ways. Therefore, he argues each point represented by the author in the reading passage and assumes that all these challenges were just in the past.
Apparently, there has been a debate about the difficulty of the studying of the old culture in Britain, and the challenges that face the archaeologists in this country. The professor in the lecture talks about a new guideline that helps control and overcome these challenges that had been faced the archeological work, and how these new rules support the archeological work in different ways. Therefore, he argues each point represented by the author in the reading passage and assumes that all these challenges were just in the past.
First of all, the professor claims that the new rules force the construction company to examine the area of construction before starting the work, so if they found any articrafts, they have to make a plan to reserve them or to change the area of construction. Therefore, the author point about the damaging to the old culture by new construction would be out of concern with this new limitation.
Second, the lecturer contends that after the new law, the government force the construction companies to pay for the archeological process, as long with this step, the fund would increase and a new resource of money has been founded to support the archeological studies, so the number of the area that had been examined is way more the number in the past. Admittedly, the author point about the low fund of the government would be practically not important anymore after the new guideline.
Finally, despite the reading passage statement about the lack of work opportunity in archaeology, therefore most of the archaeologist is working as unpaid amateurs , the professor says that now a day the new rules provide a lot of paid job opportunity in each stage of archeological process, in the preparation of the area for examination, the examination itself, the preserve of the articrafts in that area and eventually the report writing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Apparently, there has been a debate abou...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hese challenges were just in the past. First of all, the professor claims that ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t of concern with this new limitation. Second, the lecturer contends that after...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtant anymore after the new guideline. Finally, despite the reading passage sta...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 169, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...haeologist is working as unpaid amateurs , the professor says that now a day the n...
^^
Line 4, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... day the new rules provide a lot of paid job opportunity in each stage of archeo...
^^
Line 4, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f paid job opportunity in each stage of archeological process, in the preparatio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, finally, first, if, second, so, therefore, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 311.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01607717042 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97629247501 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479099678457 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.9 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 21.2450331126 179% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 107.511336612 49.2860985944 218% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 195.0 110.228320801 177% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.875 21.698381199 179% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365902542172 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190753288808 0.0996497079465 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.210761919912 0.0662205650399 318% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216308293409 0.162205337803 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.181231185496 0.0443174109184 409% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.7 13.3589403974 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.91 53.8541721854 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.0289183223 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.498013245 164% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.