The bottled water industry is a financially lucrative business that serves up 178 billion liters and brings in $62.3 billion annually. Consumers foot the bill by paying 10,000 times more for bottled versus tap water. Opponents are concerned, and for good reason, that individuals are wasting their money. What’s more, they believe consumers may be unaware of misleading advertising and potential risks from both the water and the plastic used to bottle it.
First, some companies use false advertising to mislead the public. For example, Coca Cola and PepsiCo claim that their bottled water products, Dasani and Aquafina, are healthier and better tasting than tap water from municipal sources. However, the truth is that these two best-selling brands are nothing more than bottled tap water.
Second, bottled water poses a number of serious health risks. To begin with, the lack of fluoride in marketed waters promotes cavities. In fact, individuals who drink bottled water rather than tap water can expect to experience double the amount of tooth decay. Furthermore, bottled waters are only tested for contaminants approximately once a week. In contrast, tap water is inspected hundreds of times each month. This lack of testing has led to such incidents as the Dasani scandal in the UK, where the complete stock of Coca Cola’s star product had to be recalled from all national suppliers. The recalled product contained twice the legal limit of bromate, a cancer-inducing chemical. Interestingly, it had been added to the mixture to enhance taste.
Third, the global manufacture of plastic bottles for the water industry consumes 100 million barrels of oil per annul. This translates into approximately 89 percent end up in landfills. This means they leach toxic chemicals into the soil and contaminate groundwater. As a result, the source of this bottled water may become poisoned due to our consumption of it.
In the set of materials, the professor discusses the disadvantages of bottled water industry and provides several reasons for the support of her points. This discussion strengthens the information presented in the reading passage.
Firstly, the professor claims that bottled water are unsafe. According to statistics from an international environmental agency, such industries propagate misleading information about their products using fallacious advertising. Companies’ reports are not accurate. For example, it was revealed that a company used waters from a well in an industrial waste dump instead of mineral waters from the lakes in the mountains. In another investigation, a company used tap water. Likewise, the reading supports the fact that many companies use false advertising to trick the public, and the truth is that these companies are nothing more than bottled tab water.
Secondly, the professor explains that bottled water has critical effects on weak and immune persons. According to the professor, bottled water could cause very dangerous and lethal effects on people with physical disabilities, persons who suffer from cancer or HIV and other patients. Furthermore, several samples of bottled water were analyzed, and the results indicate that half of the samples contained harmful components. What’s more, level of bacteria and chemicals was higher than the standards in one third of the samples. In the same way, the reading states that bottled water poses a number of serious health risks. Plus, bottled water companies do not run proper testing for contaminants in their water, and that’s why many scandals have been seen in the last decades.
Thirdly, the professor posits that plastic bottles are dangerous and unhealthy too. Chemicals in the plastics can pollute the underground water within a storage time of ten weeks. Moreover, plastics do not decompose easily and endure in the nature for a long period of time. Therefore, the hazardous effects of plastics can change human hormones and lead to physical disorder in the next generations. Accordingly, the reading passage says use of plastic bottles leads to air pollution and contamination of groundwater, and not only exacerbates the situation, but also engenders more problems.
flaws:
No. of Words: 349 250
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 27 in 30
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 12
No. of Words: 349 250
No. of Characters: 1867 1200
No. of Different Words: 201 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.322 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.35 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.753 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 151 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 125 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 78 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 54 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.368 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.3 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.632 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.312 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.491 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.068 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4