coins Norse
The professor discussed three main reasons why the coin found at the archaeological site in Maine provides adequate historical information. The information she presents is in direct contrast to the facts outlined in the reading passage.
First of all, the speaker makes the point that not only the coin was found in the site, but also other objects were found that reveal the fact that these objects are originally from a far place. However, according to the read due to the fact that the American site in Maine is placed more than a thousand kilometers away from the place which Norse settled and this is a reason why the coin is not related to the Norse.
Second, the lecturer points out that the Norse may have packed only their precious things. In other words, they may have not taken the coins with them. On the other hand, the reading specifies that because no other relevant object was found. Therefore, it is concluded that Norse did not bring any coins in their travel.
Third, the professor mentions that the coins may have other functions rather than trade. For instance the coins maybe were used as a part of a necklace. In contrast, the reading states that the coins are not considered as money by North Americans. As a result, they do not have any value.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, for instance, in contrast, as a result, first of all, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1054.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 224.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70535714286 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34029081461 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566964285714 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.2119079649 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8333333333 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.75 7.06452816374 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32444725353 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118573222971 0.0996497079465 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953194421951 0.0662205650399 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187612943801 0.162205337803 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702039808469 0.0443174109184 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 63.6247240618 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.