coins in North America
The professor discussed three main reasons why the coin found at the archaeological site in Maine provides adequate historical information. The information she presents is in direct comtrast to the facts outlined in the reading passage.
First of all, the speaker makes the point that not only the coin was found in the site, but also other objects were found that reveal the fact that these objects are originally from a far place. However, according to the the read due to the fact that the American site in Maine is placed more that a thousand kilometer away from the place which Norse settled and this is a reason why the coin is not related to the Norse.
Second, the lecturer points out that the Norse may have packed only their precious things. In other words, they may have not take the coins with them. On the other hand, the reading specifies that because no other relevant object was found. Therefore, it is concluded that Norse did not bring any coins in their travel.
Third, the professor mentions that the coins may have other functions rather than trade. IFor instance the coins maybe were used as a part of a necklace. In contrast, the reading states that the coins are not considered as money by North Americans. As a result, they do not have any value.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iscussed three main reasons why the coin found at the archaeological site in Main...
^^
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...from a far place. However, according to the the read due to the fact that the American ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...from a far place. However, according to the the read due to the fact that the American ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...ings. In other words, they may have not take the coins with them. On the other hand,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, for instance, in contrast, as a result, first of all, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1056.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 225.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69333333333 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32650429233 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564444444444 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.8438475342 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.75 7.06452816374 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188628466445 0.272083759551 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755028388986 0.0996497079465 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737896179835 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116647093364 0.162205337803 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704549684408 0.0443174109184 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.