The reading and lecture discusses the topic, whether a mammal called R. robustus was a active hunter of dinosaurs according to remains of psittacosaur found in his stomach? The author believes that he was just a scavenger sometimes eat unhatched dinosaur eggs. On the other hand, the professor casts doubt on all of the points made by the author. He claims that the R. robustus was an active hunter and provides few reasons for his assumption.
To begin with, the professor explains that R. robustus was an active hunter even though he was smaller in size. According to professor, he used to hunt baby psittacosaur and similar size dinosaurs. It is already known fact that R. robustus was twice bigger than the dinosaurs in his stomach. On the contrary, the article mentions that R. robustus was a scavenger hunter and was much smaller than psittacosaurs, so could not eat psittacosaurs.
In addition, the professor gives example of modern mammal Tasmenian devil, who does not have legs just beneath the body, but can run much faster that is 15km per hour. Therefore, it is likely that the R. robustus could have run faster to prey on baby psittacosaurs. The author challenges this view point and states that R. robustus's legs were unsuitable for running faster and hunting. ON the other hand, the remains of animal found in R. robustus stomach was very fast runner.
Finally, the speaker contradicts the point made by the author that there are not any teeth marks on the bones of the remains of hunted animal. But, as per speaker the R. robustus used to directly swallow it's prey rather than chewing , so no evidence of teeth marks are found on the bone of the hunted animals in his stomach. Additionally they never used hind teeth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and lecture discusses the topic, whether a mammal called R. robustus was a active...
^^
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...hether a mammal called R. robustus was a active hunter of dinosaurs according t...
^
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...obustus was a active hunter of dinosaurs according to remains of psittacosaur fou...
^^
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ther hand, the professor casts doubt on all of the points made by the author. He claims t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the professor casts doubt on all of the points made by the author. He claims tha...
^^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns for his assumption. To begin with, the professor explains that R. robustus ...
^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: smaller
...was an active hunter even though he was smaller in size. According to professor, he used to hun...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the point made by the author that there are not any teeth marks on the bones of...
^^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at there are not any teeth marks on the bones of the remains of hunted animal. B...
^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tly swallow its prey rather than chewing , so no evidence of teeth marks are found...
^^
Line 7, column 328, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
...e of the hunted animals in his stomach. Additionally they never used hind teeth.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, so, therefore, in addition, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 299.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83277591973 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58400851392 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505016722408 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.9 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 13.0662251656 184% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 21.2450331126 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5808809516 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 60.2083333333 110.228320801 55% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.4583333333 21.698381199 57% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.79166666667 7.06452816374 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 4.19205298013 262% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.27373068433 351% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0936450707916 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0291133289524 0.0996497079465 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773172847747 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.06141494512 0.162205337803 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703242827991 0.0443174109184 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.5 13.3589403974 56% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.22 53.8541721854 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 11.0289183223 51% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.85 12.2367328918 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.7273730684 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.498013245 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.