Directions: You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. Your response will be judged on the basis of the quality of your writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and their relationship to the reading passage. Typically an effective response will be 150 to 225 words.
Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the read passage
In the lecture the speaker explains why no one of the benefits presented in the reading serve as explanation of the purpose why we should plant genetically modified trees. The three reasons why the speaker refutes the points that made in the reading will be explained below.
First of all, the lecture asserts that these modified trees maybe will be more resistant than nature trees, but will not survive if they exposed to new conditions. On the other hand, the nature trees some maybe will die, but others will survive because they are not uniform as the modified trees. This point directly refutes the point from the passage, which claims that genetically modified trees are harder than the nature trees and more able to survive.
Second, the professor argues that planting these trees will cost a lot. Since companies that produce them by law will require farmers to pay for them if they want to collect the fruits or vegetables. Again, this contradicts what is stated in the passage, Which claims that planting these trees have a huge economic benefits tothose who grow them.
Finally, the speaker avers that these trees can do more damage to the local trees than anything else. Because, in fact those trees are growing very fast and among the local tress. As a result they need more water and nutrients than the nature tress. This point disputes the point from the passage as well, which is growing modified trees can prevent overexploitation of wild trees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ire farmers to pay for them if they want to collect the fruits or vegetables. Aga...
^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stated in the passage, Which claims that planting these trees have a huge economi...
^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'benefit'?
Suggestion: benefit
...anting these trees have a huge economic benefits tothose who grow them. Finally, th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ct those trees are growing very fast and among the local tress. As a result they...
^^
Line 8, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and among the local tress. As a result they need more water and nutrients than...
^^
Line 8, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...among the local tress. As a result they need more water and nutrients than the n...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, may, second, so, well, in fact, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1225.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 250.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26355119226 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4766426569 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.083333333 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0849496961031 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0364737428087 0.0996497079465 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286809290607 0.0662205650399 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0561818728115 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237522463836 0.0443174109184 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.