The writer claims that there are three possible reason to explain the migration hypothesis of the edmontosaurs while the professor expressed different opinions against all these reasons.
Firstly, the writer believes that the demontosaur’s diet supports the migration hypothesis. However, the professor argues that demontosaurs don’t have to migrate to find food since Alaska’s north slope was warmer at that moment which means abundant food plant to eat. By the time winter came, the demontosaurs could eat dead vegetation to survive.
Secondly, the writer holds that many demontosaurs lived in herd so that they migrate to avoid the winter. The professor suggests that living in herd does not mean the migration hypothesis. They lived in herd to get extra protection against the predators. Meanwhile, creature lived in herd like elks doesn’t migrate either.
Lastly, the writer holds that demontosaurs had the capability of migrating long distance. Nevertheless, the professor points out that juveniles in the herd might slow down the herd so that they could not reach their destination. As herd could not let the juvenile alone because that could not survive the in winter, the herd have to stayed there and survive in the winter.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, lastly, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1067.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 196.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44387755102 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88230086344 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561224489796 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6349741729 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0475721882756 0.272083759551 17% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0179209474531 0.0996497079465 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350659110538 0.0662205650399 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0290006579798 0.162205337803 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385412717772 0.0443174109184 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.