in the past century, the steady growth of population and increasing agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States birds population. For birds, this trend is likely to continue.
The reading passage uses some reasons to show why the number of birds in the United states is declined. The professor ,however, refutes the reason and describes there are not a declining trend in growing population of birds because of human activities.
Firstly, the reading passage states that as human population grows, increasing agriculture will lead to the destruction of birds habitat. The professor reject this point and claims that urban development will result in providing more habitat for birds such as sea gulls. She says that although population of some species is shrinked, other species is increased.
Secondly, the professor goes on to refute the claim in the reading that growing human population and increasing agriculture will result in destruction of birds' habitat. She explains that in the US less and less land is used for agricultural purposes, because the new and productive crops increase the food production. So, the habitat of the birds will not destroy.
Last, in the reading passage the writer claims that by expanding human's settlement and increasing agriculture, the use of chemical pesticides will increase. The pesticides get into the water and food chain which can be harmful for birds. The professor points out that nowadays,the new and less toxic poisons is used. Also more pest resistant crop are developed so that the need for pesticides declines.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...United states is declined. The professor ,however, refutes the reason and describe...
^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'rejects'.
Suggestion: rejects
...ruction of birds habitat. The professor reject this point and claims that urban develo...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 66, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...age the writer claims that by expanding humans settlement and increasing agriculture, ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 277, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
.... The professor points out that nowadays,the new and less toxic poisons is used. Al...
^^^^
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e professor points out that nowadays,the new and less toxic poisons is used. Also...
^^
Line 7, column 319, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...he new and less toxic poisons is used. Also more pest resistant crop are developed ...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.287449392713 0.261695866417 110% => OK
Verbs: 0.153846153846 0.158904122519 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0728744939271 0.0723426182421 101% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0404858299595 0.0435111971325 93% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0080971659919 0.0277247811725 29% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.141700404858 0.128828473217 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0566801619433 0.0370669169778 153% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.73977453371 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0121457489879 0.0208969081088 58% => OK
Particles: 0.00404858299595 0.00154638098197 262% => OK
Determiners: 0.117408906883 0.128158765124 92% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0242914979757 0.0158828679856 153% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0080971659919 0.0114777025283 71% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1394.0 1645.83664459 85% => OK
No of words: 223.0 271.125827815 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.25112107623 6.08160592843 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.04852973271 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.37668161435 0.374372842146 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.300448430493 0.287516216867 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.215246636771 0.187439937562 115% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.179372197309 0.113142543107 159% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73977453371 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533632286996 0.539623497131 99% => OK
Word variations: 49.2070417086 53.8517498576 91% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0529801325 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.5833333333 21.7502111507 85% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.825036773 49.3711431718 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.166666667 132.220823453 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5833333333 21.7502111507 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.878197800319 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 3.39072847682 177% => OK
Readability: 48.6281763827 50.5018328374 96% => OK
Elegance: 2.4 1.90840788429 126% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.517013173547 0.549887131256 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.117663450231 0.142949733639 82% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0561571125149 0.0787303798458 71% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.63844462043 0.631733273073 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.101389430715 0.139662658121 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.251637262135 0.266732575781 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.096931672657 0.103435571967 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.475413325725 0.414875509568 115% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0934290926238 0.0530846634433 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.396000249286 0.40443939384 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566264453302 0.0528353158467 107% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.1766004415 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.