TOEFL TPO topics - Integrated Writing Tasks
TPO - 06
Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects. What is specific to these online encyclopedias, however, is that any Internet user can contribute a new article or make an editorial change in an existing one. As a result, the encyclopedia is authored by the whole community of Internet users. The idea might sound attractive, but the communal online encyclopedias have several important problems that make them much less valuable than traditional, printed encyclopedias.
First, contributors to a communal online encyclopedia often lack academic credentials, thereby making their contributions partially informed at best and downright inaccurate in many cases. Traditional encyclopedias are written by trained experts who adhere to standards of academic rigor that nonspecialists cannot really achieve.
Second, even if the original entry in the online encyclopedia is correct, the communal nature of these online encyclopedias gives unscrupulous users and vandals or hackers the opportunity to fabricate, delete, and corrupt information in the encyclopedia. Once changes have been made to the original text, an unsuspecting user cannot tell the entry has been tampered with. None of this is possible with a traditional encyclopedia.
Third, the communal encyclopedias focus too frequently, and in too great a depth, on trivial and popular topics, which creates a false impression of what is important and what is not. A child doing research for a school project may discover that a major historical event receives as much attention in anonline encyclopedia as, say, a single long-running television program. The traditional encyclopedia provides a considered view of what topics to include or exclude and contains a sense of proportion that online "democratic" communal encyclopedias do not.
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'really', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'as a result', 'in many cases']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.232628398792 0.261695866417 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.138972809668 0.158904122519 87% => OK
Adjectives: 0.160120845921 0.0723426182421 221% => Less adjectives wanted.
Adverbs: 0.0513595166163 0.0435111971325 118% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00906344410876 0.0277247811725 33% => OK
Prepositions: 0.102719033233 0.128828473217 80% => OK
Participles: 0.036253776435 0.0370669169778 98% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.45453406294 2.5805825403 134% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0211480362538 0.0208969081088 101% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.102719033233 0.128158765124 80% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0151057401813 0.0158828679856 95% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0211480362538 0.0114777025283 184% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1966.0 1645.83664459 119% => OK
No of words: 292.0 271.125827815 108% => OK
Chars per words: 6.73287671233 6.08160592843 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.04852973271 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.452054794521 0.374372842146 121% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.373287671233 0.287516216867 130% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.294520547945 0.187439937562 157% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.184931506849 0.113142543107 163% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45453406294 2.5805825403 134% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609589041096 0.539623497131 113% => OK
Word variations: 67.9048351083 53.8517498576 126% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.4615384615 21.7502111507 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9869918166 49.3711431718 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.230769231 132.220823453 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 21.7502111507 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.846153846154 0.878197800319 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 59.7903055848 50.5018328374 118% => OK
Elegance: 1.86363636364 1.90840788429 98% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0122907202226 0.549887131256 2% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.071398937774 0.142949733639 50% => Sentence sentence coherence is low.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0455097881206 0.0787303798458 58% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.538091719999 0.631733273073 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.133690521151 0.139662658121 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00516290011063 0.266732575781 2% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.012143847708 0.103435571967 12% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.19545643168 0.414875509568 47% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0556784821468 0.0530846634433 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00877035846055 0.40443939384 2% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151907064543 0.0528353158467 29% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.62251655629 28% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.1766004415 157% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.