Both the passage and the lecture relate to team working process, which are considered as an efficient way in doing new projects by many organizations. On the one hand, the passage claims three reasons supporting the group working while the lecture refutes all these reasons by mentioning situations that are oppose with what the passage has predicted.
First of all, the passage states that the group reach creative solutions because all members of the group use their own skills and abilities to solve the problems. In contrast, the lecture opposes by saying that some members do not contribute in projects while others work hard. Therefore, when the projects do well the recognition will be as a whole.
In addition, the passage goes on to say that because all members of a group get in involved in projects they can reach to workable solutions as soon as possible. However, the lecture emphasizes that it takes too long and needs more meetings to reach a consensus when all members take part in making decision than one or two influencer.
Last but not least, the passage asserts that each member will have more chance to participate in group making decision due to get more rewards. Nevertheless, the lecture disputes this point by claiming that in some situation members of a group are ignored when they warn a group about a plan that it will not work well while the other members support it as a highly creative plan. If the plan failed, the blame would be placed on all members of a group.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'opposed'.
Suggestion: opposed
...asons by mentioning situations that are oppose with what the passage has predicted. ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'influencer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'influencers'.
Suggestion: influencers
...part in making decision than one or two influencer. Last but not least, the passage ass...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...situation members of a group are ignored when they warn a group about a plan th...
^^
Line 7, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...embers of a group are ignored when they warn a group about a plan that it will ...
^^
Line 7, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of a group are ignored when they warn a group about a plan that it will not wo...
^^
Line 7, column 362, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... while the other members support it as a highly creative plan. If the plan failed...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.232142857143 0.261695866417 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.175 0.158904122519 110% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0607142857143 0.0723426182421 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.05 0.0435111971325 115% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0214285714286 0.0277247811725 77% => OK
Prepositions: 0.146428571429 0.128828473217 114% => OK
Participles: 0.05 0.0370669169778 135% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.50786927172 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.025 0.0208969081088 120% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.142857142857 0.128158765124 111% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0178571428571 0.0158828679856 112% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0214285714286 0.0114777025283 187% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1508.0 1645.83664459 92% => OK
No of words: 260.0 271.125827815 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8 6.08160592843 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.326923076923 0.374372842146 87% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.265384615385 0.287516216867 92% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.15 0.187439937562 80% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0884615384615 0.113142543107 78% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50786927172 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526923076923 0.539623497131 98% => OK
Word variations: 50.9913222927 53.8517498576 95% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.7502111507 120% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6124984253 49.3711431718 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.8 132.220823453 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 21.7502111507 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.2 0.878197800319 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 3.39072847682 177% => OK
Readability: 52.5384615385 50.5018328374 104% => OK
Elegance: 1.73913043478 1.90840788429 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.559642247921 0.549887131256 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.159476552828 0.142949733639 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0490877957933 0.0787303798458 62% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.661377446001 0.631733273073 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.108934205441 0.139662658121 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.278670608348 0.266732575781 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805363869144 0.103435571967 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.412268179372 0.414875509568 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0280343213221 0.0530846634433 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.401896966677 0.40443939384 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440881914492 0.0528353158467 83% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.26048565121 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 7.0 3.49668874172 200% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.1766004415 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.