.Both the reading and the lecture discuss the the benefits and the drawbacks of a team member work. The reading focuses on the benefits of the group work and provides three reasons of support.However, the lecture disproves this statment and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the passage asserts that the group member is very effective as they have more knowledge and experience to find solutions to any problem that they are facing during the work.However,the professor refutes this idea by stating that ther are alot of people in the group work are 'free rider', which means they are depending on the other members to dot the work for them and gain accredits for that.
Moreover, the reading states that group work members are able to make risky decisions and take the responsibility for that decision . On the other hand, the orator opposes this idea by saying that group member are not responsible enough to make a decision and sometimes, they hold the responsibility to the leader of agroup.
Finally, the reading states that working in the group allow everyone in the team to 'shine' as the reward of the work attributed to the whole team.Nevertheless, the professor counteracts this point by explaining that everyone in the group try to be the influencier as he or she wants to impose their ides 0n the group members and they dropped any idea fom the other peole in the team. They do so to gain the accredit for themselves.
As shown , the lecture refutes each point made in the reading passage.
.
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: .Both the reading and the lecture discuss the the benefits and the drawbacks of a team member work.
Description: The token the is not usually followed by an article
Suggestion: Refer to the and the
ther are alot of people in the group work are 'free rider',
there are a lot of people in the group work who are 'free rider',
group member are not responsible
group members are not responsible
working in the group allow everyone
working in the group allows everyone
everyone in the group try to be the influencier
everyone in the group tries to be the influencer
Sentence: The reading focuses on the benefits of the group work and provides three reasons of support.However, the lecture disproves this statment and refutes each of the author's reasons.
Error: statment Suggestion: statement
Sentence: First of all, the passage asserts that the group member is very effective as they have more knowledge and experience to find solutions to any problem that they are facing during the work.However,the professor refutes this idea by stating that ther are alot of people in the group work are 'free rider', which means they are depending on the other members to dot the work for them and gain accredits for that.
Error: alot Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: ther Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: On the other hand, the orator opposes this idea by saying that group member are not responsible enough to make a decision and sometimes, they hold the responsibility to the leader of agroup.
Error: agroup Suggestion: group
Sentence: Finally, the reading states that working in the group allow everyone in the team to 'shine' as the reward of the work attributed to the whole team.Nevertheless, the professor counteracts this point by explaining that everyone in the group try to be the influencier as he or she wants to impose their ides 0n the group members and they dropped any idea fom the other peole in the team.
Error: ides Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: influencier Suggestion: influence
Error: fom Suggestion: form
Error: peole Suggestion: people
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 8 2
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 19 in 30
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 8 2
No. of Sentences: 9 12
No. of Words: 266 250
No. of Characters: 1227 1200
No. of Different Words: 125 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.039 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.613 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.385 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 77 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 62 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 32 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 21 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 29.556 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 24.572 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.499 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.814 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.268 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
.Both the reading and the lecture discuss...
^
Line 1, column 2, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Both
.Both the reading and the lecture discuss the...
^^^^
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...oth the reading and the lecture discuss the the benefits and the drawbacks of a team m...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...oth the reading and the lecture discuss the the benefits and the drawbacks of a team m...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reading and the lecture discuss the the benefits and the drawbacks of a team mem...
^^
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...k and provides three reasons of support.However, the lecture disproves this statment an...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...em that they are facing during the work.However,the professor refutes this idea by stat...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... they are facing during the work.However,the professor refutes this idea by stating ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...p work are free rider, which means they are depending on the other members to dot the work fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ake the responsibility for that decision . On the other hand, the orator opposes ...
^^
Line 6, column 133, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ke the responsibility for that decision . On the other hand, the orator opposes t...
^^
Line 6, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... sometimes, they hold the responsibility to the leader of agroup. Finally, the...
^^
Line 8, column 146, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Nevertheless
...f the work attributed to the whole team.Nevertheless, the professor counteracts this point b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 403, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...r peole in the team. They do so to gain the accredit for themselves. As shown , the lectu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the accredit for themselves. As shown , the lecture refutes each point made in ...
^^
Line 36, column 1, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... .
^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.27304964539 0.261695866417 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.163120567376 0.158904122519 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0354609929078 0.0723426182421 49% => Some adjectives wanted.
Adverbs: 0.0283687943262 0.0435111971325 65% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0390070921986 0.0277247811725 141% => OK
Prepositions: 0.127659574468 0.128828473217 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0283687943262 0.0370669169778 77% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.71696540876 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0390070921986 0.0208969081088 187% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.177304964539 0.128158765124 138% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.0158828679856 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00354609929078 0.0114777025283 31% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1581.0 1645.83664459 96% => OK
No of words: 265.0 271.125827815 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.96603773585 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.290566037736 0.374372842146 78% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.233962264151 0.287516216867 81% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.135849056604 0.187439937562 72% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0905660377358 0.113142543107 80% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71696540876 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483018867925 0.539623497131 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 45.5161734511 53.8517498576 85% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0529801325 69% => OK
Sentence length: 29.4444444444 21.7502111507 135% => OK
Sentence length SD: 133.733658284 49.3711431718 271% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 175.666666667 132.220823453 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4444444444 21.7502111507 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 16.0 3.39072847682 472% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 52.8406708595 50.5018328374 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.86153846154 1.90840788429 98% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.583452457884 0.549887131256 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.267256953504 0.142949733639 187% => Sentence is so close to another sentence.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.163525238731 0.0787303798458 208% => Ideas in sentences are similar.
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.860444342781 0.631733273073 136% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.17106829998 0.139662658121 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.311342529424 0.266732575781 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153142188449 0.103435571967 148% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.48775205814 0.414875509568 118% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0752460860098 0.0530846634433 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.397800119526 0.40443939384 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128067527095 0.0528353158467 242% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.62251655629 28% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 10.2958057395 68% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.