The reading passage discusses an interesting topic about a paint of a woman that is suposed to pertain to Rembrandt, but the reading passage cast doubts on the real author of the masterpiece providing three main reasons for support. However, the lecture reinforces the idea that the paint actually belongs to Rembrandt and opposed to each of the reasons of the reading passage.
First, the reading passage sustains that a main error that determinate is not a Rembrandt are in the clothes wore by the woman: the hat is not compatible with an aristocratic person. Rembrandt would never had missed that detail. On the other hand, the lecture explains that the mistake was not made by Rembrandt, but by other artist, a century later, when pretending to give an aristocratic touch to the woman, add the collar on the dress.
Secondly, the reading passage establishes that the illumiation of the paint presents basic errors. In contradiction, the lecture remarks that the collar added on later time is the culprit of that error. Once the collar was removed from the paint, there was not illumination mistake.
Finally, the lecture refutes the reading passage about the wood panel. An addition done years later to the panel gave the reading passage the wrong idea about its origin. The panel was the original one, but with the purpose to enlarge it by later owners, another frame was added.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95299145299 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5509670667 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517094017094 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2083332079 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.363636364 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281877326292 0.272083759551 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117479571633 0.0996497079465 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656418628569 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172268924473 0.162205337803 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504580011169 0.0443174109184 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.