Both lecture and article describe the Chevalier's memoir. The reading passage claims that memoir contains inaccurate the data. In really, presented event in some episode is more interesting and glamorous but it was not happened in real. While, the lecturer says that whole memoir were not correct but episodes mentioned in the reading passage was reliable and accurate in the historical periods.
Firstly, the lecturer mentions that the chevalier took loan from the merchant because of he sold his properties but time need to transfer money on bank account. In Switzerland need huge money for gambling and the Chevelier has not enough money, therefore he took the loan. It does not mean that Chevalier was not affluent. The lecturer refutes the point made in the reading passage that the Chevalier borrowed money so he was not wealthy.
Secondly, the lecturer explains that when the Chevalier converse to the Voltaire, each night he wrote the daily conversation on his notes. The notes helped to him to made correct the memoir. He contradicts the doubt made in the reading passage that the Chervalier not remember exact conversation and not accurate the event presented in memoir.
Lastly, the lecturer states that other prisoners were more powerful but they could not escape by bribery, since it was very strick in the Venice for bribery. According to the government record's the ceiling was repairing after prisoner escapes, therefore this evidence bolster the memoir events. The lecturer responds to point made in the reading passage that the Chevalier escape from the jail by gave bribe to jailer
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 79, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_I[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'because he' instead.
Suggestion: because he
...e chevalier took loan from the merchant because of he sold his properties but time need to tr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, lastly, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 261.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13793103448 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50711762584 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7887277648 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7857142857 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361201155999 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133072084441 0.0996497079465 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434510325063 0.0662205650399 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225149317223 0.162205337803 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278603592074 0.0443174109184 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.