tpo 12-integrated
The lecturer is talking about specific reasons that he disagrees with the passage. He believes the reasons given in the passage are not convincing and the passage has jumed into conclusion.
The first point that he mentions, is the fact that Jane Austen's portrait was recognized by her family. But at the time that her family gave their permission for the use of Austen's portrait, she had been dead for almost seventy years. So none of hear family members could not have seen her in their life time, and certainly the could not be able to recognize a painting of her.
At this point, the lecturer brings up another faulty thing in the passage. The passage states that the face of the portrait looked very similar to the sketch done by Jane's sister, Cassandra. He argues with the passage and says that at that time there were many young teen girls in Austen's family. The portrait could be from any one of them and it is not enough evidence to say that it is Jane's portrait. Many believe that the portrait was painted form a cousin of Jane's, named Mary Ann.
The lecturer brings up another point which is very interesting. He says, the only reason the portrait is related to Humphrey is the painting style. But the canvas of the portrait, was bought from a William Leg, which did not start selling canvases until Jane was 27. So Jane could not have been the one in the portrait, the lecturer believes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...embers could not have seen her in their life time, and certainly the could not be able to...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, so, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1157.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59126984127 5.08290768461 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23119997723 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.2009606337 49.2860985944 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.6428571429 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.78571428571 7.06452816374 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358677976916 0.272083759551 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120706534449 0.0996497079465 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858709265576 0.0662205650399 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202176523562 0.162205337803 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115409504983 0.0443174109184 260% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.3589403974 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 12.2367328918 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.